2021
DOI: 10.4000/archeosciences.10179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping Archeological Signs From Airborne Lidar Data Using Deep Neural Networks: Primary Results

Abstract: Highlights:• Complexity of large-scale Airborne LIDAR data: its processing, and interpretation emerges the necessity of automated analysis with novel techniques.• Detection and documentation of archaeological ruins, hidden in the forests of the Swedish landscape.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is now fairly well known in the literature that the investigation of the human past requires an interdisciplinary approach in which remote sensing data represent an irreplaceable investigative tool in the search for traces of the past, sometimes explaining the signs of the present. The anomalies, the colour, the patterns visible from a remote sensing scene are all the result of the interaction between natural phenomena and human activities whose ultimate outcome is the landscape (Küçükdemirci et al, 2021). In this regard, it is now widely accepted that certain types of buried archaeological deposits can be identified due to their inherent ability to produce different proxy indicators visible on the ground, even though physical and micro topographical changes that can be intercepted from an aerial view (Crawford 1929;Dassie 1978;Wilson 1982;Optiz and Cowley 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is now fairly well known in the literature that the investigation of the human past requires an interdisciplinary approach in which remote sensing data represent an irreplaceable investigative tool in the search for traces of the past, sometimes explaining the signs of the present. The anomalies, the colour, the patterns visible from a remote sensing scene are all the result of the interaction between natural phenomena and human activities whose ultimate outcome is the landscape (Küçükdemirci et al, 2021). In this regard, it is now widely accepted that certain types of buried archaeological deposits can be identified due to their inherent ability to produce different proxy indicators visible on the ground, even though physical and micro topographical changes that can be intercepted from an aerial view (Crawford 1929;Dassie 1978;Wilson 1982;Optiz and Cowley 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it is also highlighted in Gallwey et al (2019), segmentation tasks for medical and biomedical image analysis share similar challenges with LIDAR data. Thus, recently similar segmentation approaches started to be adapted to extract the archaeological features from LIDAR data (Bundzel et al, 2020; Gallwey et al, 2019; Guyot et al, 2021; Kazimi et al, 2019; Küçükdemirci et al, 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it is seen in the studies above, this approach is more commonly applied on LIDAR‐derived datasets, especially those related to archaeological research, mainly due to the limitation of a large number of annotated datasets which is still obstacle in this field. Thus, it is necessary to find a way of developing different network architectures with a limited quantity of annotated datasets and to create an original labelled data catalogue for archaeological remote sensing (Bundzel et al, 2020; Gallwey et al, 2019; Küçükdemirci et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has experimented with geospatial data/images (satellite, aerial, lidar), texts, categorical tableau data, point clouds, and other datasets. For instance, one can consider some indicative examples such as the work that has been done on bone classification [1], remote sensing archaeology [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12], geophysical prospection [13][14][15][16][17], detection of objects in paintings [18], classification of pottery [19], and the 3D reconstruction of heritage buildings [20]. The main reason behind this growing trend, which has been noticed in the last five years in all scientific domains, underlies the nuisance generated when dealing with multivariate analysis of high-volume datasets, which are challenging to process and interpret.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%