2022
DOI: 10.3390/rs14246249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping Arctic Sea-Ice Surface Roughness with Multi-Angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer

Abstract: Sea-ice surface roughness (SIR) is a crucial parameter in climate and oceanographic studies, constraining momentum transfer between the atmosphere and ocean, providing preconditioning for summer-melt pond extent, and being related to ice age and thickness. High-resolution roughness estimates from airborne laser measurements are limited in spatial and temporal coverage while pan-Arctic satellite roughness does not extend over multi-decadal timescales. Launched on the Terra satellite in 1999, the NASA Multi-angl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean and standard deviation of in situ snow depths across the whole FYI site was 20.4 ± 8.0 cm. the Arctic spring [46]. MISR roughness observations from the Eureka FYI site in April 2016 were at almost exactly the modal pan-Arctic FYI roughness for the month (Appendix A2).…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The mean and standard deviation of in situ snow depths across the whole FYI site was 20.4 ± 8.0 cm. the Arctic spring [46]. MISR roughness observations from the Eureka FYI site in April 2016 were at almost exactly the modal pan-Arctic FYI roughness for the month (Appendix A2).…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Furthermore, Renfrew et al (2019) note that the effect of sea ice on surface drag is indirect, as ice morphology is the salient variable rather than SIC itself. The lack of available data places a full consideration of wind drag outside the scope of this paper, and we echo Johnson et al (2022) in calling for an extension of existing and proven mapping techniques using satellite observations to retrieve sea-ice roughness over the Antarctic ice sheets. We acknowledge the limitations that this places on our work tying SIC to cloud macrophysical properties, but contend that meaningful correlations may still be observed and reported.…”
Section: Surface-boundary Layer Physical Connectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, our knowledge of the distribution of fast‐ice roughness is also lacking. Combining maps of fast‐ice distribution with images of SAR backscatter (Segal et al., 2020) or roughness maps determined from multi‐angle visible imagery (e.g., Johnson et al., 2022) hold the key to increasing our knowledge in this area. Laser altimetry, with its fine spatial resolution (e.g., 17 m footprint in the case of the ICESat‐2), can also be used to determine the roughness of ice (van Tiggelen et al., 2021), though such techniques have yet to be implemented over Antarctic fast ice.…”
Section: Large‐scale Distribution Seasonality and Thickness Estimates...mentioning
confidence: 99%