2012
DOI: 10.1134/s0001437012060148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping Baltic Sea shallow water environments with airborne remote sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Five different benthic habitat classes were defined for the imaged area based on the video data and expert knowledge: "hard bottom with ephemeral algae," "dense higher-order plant habitats," "dense charophyte community," "sparse higher order plants and/or Charophytes on soft bright bottom" and "optically deep water (>2 m)." As indicated previously [12,43], the spectral appearance of the same habitat type varies depending on the water depth and water quality. Therefore, training regions were selected from different water depths and water quality conditions for each benthic habitat class.…”
Section: Image-based Classificationmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Five different benthic habitat classes were defined for the imaged area based on the video data and expert knowledge: "hard bottom with ephemeral algae," "dense higher-order plant habitats," "dense charophyte community," "sparse higher order plants and/or Charophytes on soft bright bottom" and "optically deep water (>2 m)." As indicated previously [12,43], the spectral appearance of the same habitat type varies depending on the water depth and water quality. Therefore, training regions were selected from different water depths and water quality conditions for each benthic habitat class.…”
Section: Image-based Classificationmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…For example, the benthic vegetation signal rapidly decreases as water depth increases and almost completely disappears within a depth of 2.0 m in the Haapsalu Bay area. The results from more open sea areas on the western side of the Estonian biggest island of Saaremaa showed that the benthic vegetation could be detected down to depths of 5-6 m [43]. Therefore, the areas below 2.0 m were classified as deep-turbid in the Haapsalu Bay area, where no information about benthic types could be retrieved with remote sensing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition to the community level %SAV assessment, we also addressed the issue of species and/or class level %SAV mapping. Previous studies from the Baltic Sea showed that species level habitat maps cannot be retrieved from the Baltic Sea by remote sensing methods [8,53]. The reason for it is the high spatial heterogeneity, as well as the high spectral similarity between different species belonging to the same vegetation class (brown macroalgae, red macroalgae, green macroalgae, higher plants, etc.).…”
Section: Sav Percent Cover Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximum Likelihood Classifier (MLC) was chosen to carry out the classification since it is the most widely used supervised classification method (Yang et al, 2015). MLC automatically categorizes pixels in an image into a trained (i.e., target) class (Vahtmäe et al, 2012). MLC evaluates the brightness of one band compared to the other (variance and covariance) in the training class and then it categorizes pixels based on its maximum probability of belonging in a class (McCarthy and Halls, 2014).…”
Section: Supervised Classification and Accuracy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%