2019
DOI: 10.1101/2019.12.26.888842
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping biology from mouse to man using transfer learning

Abstract: Biomedical research often involves conducting experiments on model organisms in the anticipationthat the biology learnt from these experiments will transfer to the human. Yet, it is commonly the case that biology does not transfer effectively, often for unknown reasons. Despite its importance to translational research this transfer process is not currently rigorously quantified. Here, we show that transfer learning -the branch of machine learning that concerns passing information from one domain to another -ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(45 reference statements)
1
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, our model allows incremental training by iterative training with new observations, which allows us to encompass a larger representation of different traits. Furthermore, approaches based on transfer learning can also enable the adaptation of our model to other target domains such as clinical settings or even, in a similar fashion to mapping biological relationships from mouse to human 85 , to facilitate translational approaches mapping animal behavioral/physiological interplay to human models or vice-versa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, our model allows incremental training by iterative training with new observations, which allows us to encompass a larger representation of different traits. Furthermore, approaches based on transfer learning can also enable the adaptation of our model to other target domains such as clinical settings or even, in a similar fashion to mapping biological relationships from mouse to human 85 , to facilitate translational approaches mapping animal behavioral/physiological interplay to human models or vice-versa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raw sequencing reads were demultiplexed, grouping reads by cell barcode to generate a digital gene expression (DGE) matrix for downstream analysis, using Drop-Seq tools (v1.0). A modified multi-mapper pipeline was executed to correct multiple alignment [14].…”
Section: Sequence Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, 9,795 cells were profiled, reduced to 7,385 following quality control processing. To further increase the cell pool for identification of skeletal progenitors, this data was combined with sc-RNAseq data for unsorted bone marrow populations from 3 patients [14] We next sought to identify candidate SSC markers, through examination of localised gene expression in pericytes and endothelial cell clusters, representing 233 and 460 cells respectively. Analysis of differential gene expression between pericytes/endothelial cells, termed 'Skeletal progenitors', and other cell types indicated SPARCL1, as a potential SSC marker due to elevated expression ( Figure 1C).…”
Section: Drop-seq Of Whole Bone Marrow Reveals Sparcl1 As a Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…denen des Menschen verglichen werden (Abb. 2B), wie wir kürzlich zeigen konnten [7]. Des Weiteren konnten die trainierten Modelle auch vergleichend eingesetzt werden.…”
Section: Joint Research Center For Computational Biomedicine Rwth Aaunclassified
“…2B). Im Vergleich mit den Modellen, die keinen Informationstransfer nutzen, kann man herausfi nden, welcher Zugewinn bei der Sensitivität oder Präzision des Modells durch das vorherige Lernen von Genexpressionsprofilen der Mauszellen erreicht wird [7]. Dieser Zugewinn kann nun als Maß für die Gemeinsamkeiten zwischen dem Modellorganismus (Ursprungsdomäne) und dem Menschen (Zieldomäne) genutzt werden.…”
Section: Joint Research Center For Computational Biomedicine Rwth Aaunclassified