2017
DOI: 10.3390/ijgi6100298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping Changes in Carbon Storage and Productivity Services Provided by Riparian Ecosystems of Semi-Arid Environments in Northwestern Mexico

Abstract: We analyze the importance of riparian ecosystems (RE) as critical areas for carbon storage and productivity in semi-arid regions of Northwest Mexico. We calculated the carbon storage by land cover and compared temporal trends of basal productivity (MODIS) and pre-monsoon productivity (Landsat) of RE, to other land cover types. We used land cover maps generated previously for the region (years 1993, 2002, and 2011), assigning values of carbon stored in aerial and root biomass, as well as organic carbon stored i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in EVI averages between riparian and desert habitats are consistent with other findings [8,17,35] where a higher productivity is attributed to riparian vegetation when compared to its adjacent vegetation and with the fact that water availability promotes vegetation productivity in riparian habitats [55,65,66]. Also, the seasonal difference in EVI values for desert habitat is much greater than in riparian habitat, showing that riparian habitats maintain more stable productivity rates than desert habitats, which respond drastically during the growth season when water is available through precipitation.…”
Section: Photosynthetic Activity Of Riparian Habitats and Desert Habisupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Differences in EVI averages between riparian and desert habitats are consistent with other findings [8,17,35] where a higher productivity is attributed to riparian vegetation when compared to its adjacent vegetation and with the fact that water availability promotes vegetation productivity in riparian habitats [55,65,66]. Also, the seasonal difference in EVI values for desert habitat is much greater than in riparian habitat, showing that riparian habitats maintain more stable productivity rates than desert habitats, which respond drastically during the growth season when water is available through precipitation.…”
Section: Photosynthetic Activity Of Riparian Habitats and Desert Habisupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Based on EVI analysis, our results suggest that riparian sites with high disturbance due to human activities (which include changes in water availability, as suggested by previous studies [8,23,35] and changes in the composition and structure of vegetation) have lower photosynthetic activity (and hence productivity) than less disturbed areas.…”
Section: Photosynthetic Activity Of Riparian Habitats and Desert Habimentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Acacia dealbata show the highest average for the total carbon stocks (250.7 ± 89.5 tC ha −1 ), followed by Alnus glutinosa (161.6 ± 11.8 tC ha −1 ) and Salix salviifolia (73.1 ± 16.9 tC ha −1 ). Carbon reservoirs increase with forest age, successional stages and vegetation development [15]. The contrasting carbon stocks estimates found for each riparian species mainly reflect the capacity for tree growth and the biomass accumulation in the aboveground woody component, which is substantially different between Alnus glutinosa and Salix salviifolia.…”
Section: Riparian Carbon Stocksmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Field-based estimations can be combined with GIS techniques and remote sensing approaches to obtain large-scale maps of vegetation, soil and total carbon stock distributions. Although in a very limited number, these spatial modelling approaches have been successfully applied in the USA [13,14] and Mexico [15], but also in Europe [12,16,17]. The most common methodologies rely on calibrating satellite measurements (spectral, textural and geometric variables) to in situ estimates of aboveground biomass (AGB) at field study plots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation