Mapping Clinical Barriers and Evidence‐Based Implementation Strategies in Low‐to‐Middle Income Countries (LMICs)

Abstract

Background: Low-to-middle income countries (LMICs) experience a high burden of disease from both non-communicable and communicable diseases. Addressing these public health concerns requires effective implementation strategies and localization of translation of knowledge into practice.Aim: To identify and categorize barriers and strategies to evidence implementation in LMICs from published evidence implementation studies.Methods: A descriptive analysis of key characteristics of evidence implementation projects completed as part of a 6-month, multi-phase, intensive evidence-based clinical fellowship program, conducted in LMICs and published in the JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports was undertaken. Barriers were identified and categorized to the Donabedian dimensions of care (structure, process, and outcome), and strategies were mapped to the Cochrane effective practice and organization of care taxonomy.Results: A total of 60 implementation projects reporting 58 evidence-based clinical audit topics from LMICs were published between 2010 and 2018. The projects included diverse populations and were predominantly conducted in tertiary care settings. A total of 279 barriers to implementation were identified. The most frequently identified groupings of barriers were process-related and associated predominantly with staff knowledge. A total of 565 strategies were used across all projects, with every project incorporating more than one strategy to address barriers to implementation of evidence-based practice; most strategies were categorized as educational meetings for healthcare workers.Linking Evidence to Action: Context-specific strategies are required for successful evidence implementation in LMICs, and a number of common barriers can be addressed using locally available, low-cost resources. Education for healthcare workers in LMICs is an effective awareness-raising, workplace culture, and practice-transforming strategy for evidence implementation. BACKGROUNDLow-to-middle income countries (LMICs) experience a high burden of disease from both non-communicable and communicable diseases (Ojo et al., 2019). Addressing these public health concerns requires effective implementation strategies and localization of translation of knowledge into practice (Edwards, Zweigenthal, & Olivier, 2019). In LMICs, where resources are scarce and burden of disease is high, justification to intervene in healthcare practice must be based on high-quality, evidence-based findings (Edwards et al., 2019). However, despite a growing body of research to inform clinical decision-making that considers the best available evidence (

Midwives’ perceptions towards the ministry of health guidelines for the provision of immediate postpartum care in rural health facilities in Uganda

“…The results suggest that personal, interpersonal and institution barriers exist regarding adoption or implementation of recommended WHO guidelines on maternal and newborn health. This finding concurred with reviews which found that while the barriers identified are broadly similar in theme to those reported from high-income settings, their specific nature often differs as it is contextual [ 44 , 47 ]. For instance, at an individual level, lack of interest in the evidence supporting guidelines, poor motivation for using the guidelines, subjective feelings that following new recommendations may erode interpersonal relationships with clients or erode professionalism, and expectations of providing individualized care may threaten successful implementation [ 44 ].…”

“…Failure to recognize and appreciate good work or good performance; poor communication and lack of team teamwork; organizational constraints (such as organization of care, duty coverage and staffing norms) and limited resources (both financial and non-financial) are also notable barriers. Counterproductive health worker norms (such as absenteeism); absence of perceived benefits or incentives linked to adoption of new practices; difficulties accepting change and failure to adopt new changes; lack of client motivation; and conflicting attitudes and beliefs (of both the clients and healthcare providers) do hinder guideline adoption and were noted in this study [ 41 , 44 – 46 ]. These barriers may largely be because guidelines are adopted from high income settings and there may be little or no involvement of the end user in the development of those that are developed in low income settings [ 47 ].…”

Barriers and facilitators influencing EBP readiness: Building organizational and nurse capacity

“…The investigators' next steps are to use this evidence as a guide for organizational infrastructure to support the culture and implementa- All frontline staff nurses should be accountable for embracing and advancing evidence in professional practice and patient care (Crawford & Scott, 2011;Speroni et al, 2020;Whitehorn et al, 2021). While past recommendations frequently focus on senior management and executive leaders creating and supporting EBP (Berthelsen & Hølge-Hazelton, 2021;McNett et al, 2021;Shuman et al, 2019), professional nurse engagement must also be emphasized, along with science-based strategies to enhance professionalism and continued growth of system-wide EBP culture.…”

Applying the iDARE Methodology in Uganda, Kenya, and Tanzania to Improve Health Outcomes During the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…It incited codesigning of culturally sensitive, relevant SBC approaches, including appropriate measures that reflected the lived experiences of the target population, while addressing data collection and usage constraints across all levels. 16 iDARE teams must always consist of the relevant local stakeholders, with particular attention to inclusivity and representation of all actors within the socioecological environment.…”