Mapping cultural ecosystem services in the hyper arid environment of south of Jordan

Abstract

Cultural ecosystem services (CESs) refer to the non-monetary benefits that nature provides humans. This study aimed to allocate and map the CESs in the hyper arid region at the southern part of Wadi Araba as a unique ecosystem in Jordan. 296 residents were participated in a structured questionnaire. The respondents were prompted to indicate CES by drawing dots on a geo-referenced landscape map corresponding to any areas they considered as CES. The results showed that (81.1%) of the locals practice hiking (71.3%) of locals practice walking, and (66.2%) of the locals visit sand dunes which are all among the most CESs the locals engage with. Moreover, respondents expressed that these activities are not related to their primary source of income. The results were mapped and subjected to hot-spot and statistical analyses using a geographical information system (GIS)-based spatial evaluation and statistical analysis using the kernel density estimation (KDE) and Getis-Ord Gi* statistics with inverse distance weight (IDW) interpolation. Overall, the CESs provided by their region were appreciated by most residents. The hot-spot analysis revealed that those core hot-spots (Getis-Ord-Gi* values equal to p = 0.01) covered 19.6% while core cold spots covered 21.2% of the study area. The respondents expressed eagerness to contribute to a constant flow of CESs if the restoration plans are fully supported by the local community. The CES maps generated using the data collected in the present study can serve as baseline measures of the CES provisions subject to change based on the parameters of each development scenario. Furthermore, these maps could help support current and future management efforts by integrating communities’ preferences into development and conservation initiatives, thereby ensuring more efficient and effective utilization of CESs.

Assessment of Vegetation Dynamics at a Hyper Arid Region Using Remote Sensing, a Case Study from The Arava Valley

“…To answer the fourth research question regarding the impact of anthropogenic activity on vegetation cover, we examined the difference in land management regulation between the state of Israel (non-grazed) and Jordan (grazed). On the Israeli side of the Arava Valley, grazing is prohibited, while on the Jordanian side, grazing is not restricted [14,71,72]. As the geological-pedological setting of the two countries is different in many areas [73], we choose to assess the difference in vegetation cover only at alluvial areas which are similar in size and climate on both sides of the border.…”

Identifying the Climatic and Anthropogenic Impact on Vegetation Surrounding the Natural Springs of the Arava Valley Using Remote Sensing Methods

“…The Disi aquifer is a fossil aquifer drained from western Sudia Arabia toward the Jordanian side of the Dead Sea [39] (the aquifer and its related springs are out of our study area). Four main villages on the Jordanian side of the Arava are home to ~10,000 residents (in 2022) who depend on traditional agriculture for their livelihood [40].…”