SummaryTreatment of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) commonly involves ablating sites showing electrograms with the earliest activity relative to the VA, but there is no threshold value for prematurity guaranteeing success. Ablation of sites with great prematurity can still result in failure.We hypothesized that isochronal map area (ISCA), derived from isochrones indicating electrogram prematurity, could help identify ablation targets in VA patients, as well as predict outcome. Specifically, we hypothesized that smaller ICSA for a given prematurity value would indicate a shallower arrhythmogenic focus leading to a higher likelihood of successful ablation.We studied ICSA in 29 patients (12 males, 57 [17-65] 1,2) Thus, frequent idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are a target for catheter ablation. Ablation of sites with electrograms preceding the PVC on the 12-lead surface ECG by the longest period of time is expected to maximize the chances of successful elimination of PVCs, since they are likely to be closest to the ectopic focus. For purposes of this article, we will define the duration between a PVC and electrograms preceding it as prematurity. It would be useful if there were a threshold value of prematurity over which successful ablation was assured. Unfortunately, the range of prematurity values resulting in successful ablation overlaps with values for unsuccessful ablation sites, [3][4][5] and therefore, better or additional criteria are needed.We hypothesized that part of the reason that ablation of a site with great prematurity does not necessarily result in successful elimination of a focus is that intramural depth of the focus plays a role. A deeper focus may be more difficult to ablate, not only because of the ablative energy failing to reach the focus effectively, but because excitation reaching the endocardium will arrive at a larger area at the same precocity, so that the site ablated might not be directly above the focus. In contrast, a more superficial focus would produce a smaller excited area at the same precocity. We therefore tested whether what is called isochronal map area (ISCA) measurement could provide a new predictor for eliminating VAs, and whether more superficial sites of origin would have smaller ISCA (Figure 1). ISCA has been analyzed previously in patients with RVOT VAs, [6][7][8] but no one has ever evaluated its ability to discriminate between multiple sites of VA origin as we have attempted to do here.From the