2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2011.05266.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping deeply-buried geothermal faults using microtremor array analysis

Abstract: S U M M A R YIn this paper, the spatial autocorrelation microtremor array analysis is utilized to map deeplyburied subtle faults that have primary controls on geothermal reservoirs. We identified a low-velocity anomaly which is approximately 50 m wide at about 550-1400 m deep. A well drilled based on this anomaly later successfully produced hot water and further proved that the low-velocity anomaly was caused by a highly fractured zone at depths from 700 to 1500 m. Our results clearly demonstrate that the micr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SPAC method is a data-processing method to obtain a microtremor signal and extract the phase velocity dispersion curve of the Rayleigh wave from the vertical component of the microtremor signal by deploying the observation array [15]. It requires a circular observation array; four microtremor acquisition stations are located in the array (Figure 1), one of which is located at the center of the circle (S1), with the other three (S2, S3, S4) evenly distributed on the circumference of the radius (r), forming an equilateral triangle [16]. Taking S1 (0, 0) and S2 (r, θ), the surface wave signals are u (0, 0, ω, t) and u (r, θ, ω, t).…”
Section: Spacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SPAC method is a data-processing method to obtain a microtremor signal and extract the phase velocity dispersion curve of the Rayleigh wave from the vertical component of the microtremor signal by deploying the observation array [15]. It requires a circular observation array; four microtremor acquisition stations are located in the array (Figure 1), one of which is located at the center of the circle (S1), with the other three (S2, S3, S4) evenly distributed on the circumference of the radius (r), forming an equilateral triangle [16]. Taking S1 (0, 0) and S2 (r, θ), the surface wave signals are u (0, 0, ω, t) and u (r, θ, ω, t).…”
Section: Spacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then did the tests with three other kinds of arrays (first column in Fig. 7), which are triangular, circular and spiral arrays (e.g., Xu et al, 2012;Cho et al, 2013;Kennett et al, 2015), to investigate the effect of different geometries. Again, we set the directional wavefield to come from the northeast at an azimuth φ=60°.…”
Section: Wavelength Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spatial autocorrelation (SPAC) method is one of the most efficient ways to retrieve surface waves from ambient seismic noise (Aki, 1957(Aki, , 1965. Recent studies of the SPAC method include an extension of the SPAC method to mixed-component correlations (Haney et al, 2012), a generic theory using three-component data (Cho et al, 2006), applications using different array configurations (Ling and Okada, 1993;Bettig et al, 2001;Ohori et al, 2002;Cho et al, 2004;Chavez-Garcia et al, 2005;Xu et al, 2012), direct inversion of SPAC coefficients (Wathelet, 2005), discussion of the relationships between the SPAC method and the traditional cross-correlation technique (Chávez-García and Luzón, 2005;Yokoi and Margaryan, 2008;Ekström et al, 2009;Tsai and Moschetti, 2010), different ways to calculate SPAC coefficients (Weemstra et al, 2013;Weemstra et al, 2014), multimode inversion of surface waves (Ikeda et al, 2012), and extraction of attenuation coefficients (Prieto et al, 2009;Lawrence and Prieto, 2011;Tsai, 2011;Nakahara, 2012;Lawrence et al, 2013;Weemstra et al, 2013;Menon et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dispersion curve is then inverted to obtain the S-wave velocity structure of the subsurface media, which serves the exploration objective [ 1 ]. The detection of buried faults [ 4 , 5 , 6 ], underground boulders [ 7 ], the soil–rock interface [ 8 , 9 , 10 ], goaf [ 11 ], and landslide mass structures [ 12 , 13 ] are a few of the engineering issues that have been successfully solved using the microtremor survey method in recent years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%