1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0034-4257(96)00153-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping deforestation and land use in amazon rainforest by using SIR-C imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
67
0
6

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
67
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Those areas of primary forest present σ 0 hh = -7.51 dB± 3.34, σ 0 hv = -12.25dB ±3.15 and σ 0 vv = -7.53dB ± 3.24; secondary succession areas, which represent intermediate and advanced phases (characterized by the old regeneration age and also by the vertical structure) present σ 0 hh = -7.38 dB± 2.34, σ 0 hv = -11.95dB ± 2.27 and σ 0 vv = -7.06dB ± 2.29. The values found in this study are coherent with those obtained by Hoekman and Quiñones (2000), SAATCHI et al (1997), SANTOS et al (2002), whose variability can be attributed to general differences in the horizontal and vertical structure of the strata from the forest typologies. This also shows that the sensor SAR-R99B presents an adequate radiometric response.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Those areas of primary forest present σ 0 hh = -7.51 dB± 3.34, σ 0 hv = -12.25dB ±3.15 and σ 0 vv = -7.53dB ± 3.24; secondary succession areas, which represent intermediate and advanced phases (characterized by the old regeneration age and also by the vertical structure) present σ 0 hh = -7.38 dB± 2.34, σ 0 hv = -11.95dB ± 2.27 and σ 0 vv = -7.06dB ± 2.29. The values found in this study are coherent with those obtained by Hoekman and Quiñones (2000), SAATCHI et al (1997), SANTOS et al (2002), whose variability can be attributed to general differences in the horizontal and vertical structure of the strata from the forest typologies. This also shows that the sensor SAR-R99B presents an adequate radiometric response.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…There are several interaction mechanisms of the radar signal with forest targets, such as: multiple backscatter within the canopy (volumetric scattering), direct scattering from the tree trunks, scattering from the interaction canopy-soil, scattering from the interaction trunk-soil (double bounce), whose intensities depend on the SAR wavelengths, on the polarization, on the angle of incidence and on the terrain parameters. (CLOUDE and POTTIER, 1997;FREEMAN and DURDEN, 1998) According several studies (SAATCHI et al, 1997;HOEKMAN and QUINÕNES, 2000;SANTOS et al, 2002), SAR data are also used to model forest volume and biomass estimation, using the polarimetric backscatter attributes. Depending on the frequency of the sensor, there is a saturation of radar signal for those areas with high biomass concentration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to measuring one-time biomass densities, pol-SAR also provides the 589 capability of monitoring biomass changes resulting from clear-cutting, forest fires, insect 590 disturbance, wind damage, and to some extent more subtle changes in forest structure 591 (Saatchi et al 1997;Rignot et al 1994;Couturier et al 2001;Siegert et al 2001;Salas et 592 al. 2002;Ranson et al 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sobreposição entre as densidades das classes é quase total nas polarizações HH e VV e um pouco menor na polarização HV. A melhor separação das classes em HV se deve ao contraste criado pela sensibilidade da polarização cruzada ao espalhamento volumétrico, produzido no interior das copas das árvores, e pela baixa resposta de solos expostos ou cobertos por vegetação baixa (Saatchi et al, 1997). A grande sobreposição entre as densidades indica que pode ser A Tabela 2 apresenta os valores de índice kappa de cada uma das classificações realizadas.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified