2017
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping DNA methylation with high-throughput nanopore sequencing

Abstract: Chemical modifications to DNA regulate its biological function. We present a framework for mapping methylation to cytosine and adenosine with the Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION using its ionic current signal. We map three cytosine variants and two adenine variants. The results show that our model is sensitive enough to detect changes in genomic DNA methylation levels as a function of growth phase in E. coli.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
366
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 432 publications
(369 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
366
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, these algorithms are typically trained to predict exclusively four bases (A, C, G, T), and thus cannot directly identify DNA-or RNA-modified nucleotides. There have nonetheless been recent reports describing computational models capable of detecting modified DNA bases, by training models from biological control data and by observing conspicuous alterations of ionic current at specific positions (Stoiber et al 2016;McIntyre et al 2017;Rand et al 2017;Simpson et al 2017). With respect to DRS, these strategies have recently been applied to characterize the epitranscriptome, namely the identification of m 6 A (Garalde et al 2016) and conserved 16S ribosomal RNA base modifications and a 7-methylguanosine modification associated with antibiotic resistance .…”
Section: Future Approaches: Direct Rna Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, these algorithms are typically trained to predict exclusively four bases (A, C, G, T), and thus cannot directly identify DNA-or RNA-modified nucleotides. There have nonetheless been recent reports describing computational models capable of detecting modified DNA bases, by training models from biological control data and by observing conspicuous alterations of ionic current at specific positions (Stoiber et al 2016;McIntyre et al 2017;Rand et al 2017;Simpson et al 2017). With respect to DRS, these strategies have recently been applied to characterize the epitranscriptome, namely the identification of m 6 A (Garalde et al 2016) and conserved 16S ribosomal RNA base modifications and a 7-methylguanosine modification associated with antibiotic resistance .…”
Section: Future Approaches: Direct Rna Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…106 Novel high-throughput nanopore sequencing variants, as well as diversity in technological platforms and in required sequencing depth, have also stimulated contributions to the recent literature. 107,108 Increasingly, sophisticated bioinformatic methods are required for downstream analyses as researchers attempt to interpret multi-locus methylation information from multiple samples, for example, methods such as model-based clustering described by Houseman et al, 109 tailored for data obtained with methylation-specific microarrays. Multivariate statistical methods, particularly for both supervised and unsupervised clustering, principal component analysis, regression and visualization tools, such as heatmaps, have proved vital to interpretation of outcomes for these complex data, 110 which are generated by combinations of epigenetic changes and molecular events.…”
Section: Targeted Analysis Methods and Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanopore sequencing uses pores through which nucleic acid strands are Bpulled^and the ionic pattern reveals the nucleotide sequence, including modifications (Jain et al 2017;Shendure et al 2017). These technologies are still in the developmental phase but show great promise (Rand et al 2017). With continued technical development, they may be employed to aging research making direct analysis of DNA modification patterns from un-manipulated DNA possible.…”
Section: Alternatives To Conversion-based Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%