2006
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.200500626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping Electrochemiluminescence as Generated at Double‐Band Microelectrodes by Confocal Microscopy under Steady State

Abstract: A confocal microspectrometer was used to collect spatially resolved electrochemiluminescence (ECL) spectra from the annihilation reaction between Ru(bpy)3+ and Ru(bpy)3(3+), each species being generated at a platinum band microelectrode and separated by a micrometric insulating gap. The use of a confocal microspectrometer allows in situ photon detection of the ECL reaction with micrometric spatial resolution and observes the concentration distribution of the photon source in the vicinity of the interelectrode … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[37] In this case, the annihilation reaction can be demonstrated because light emission is an indicator of chemical reactivity and because the distribution of such emission can be studied spatially, for example, at different distances between the generating electrodes, [37] or by optical sampling of the spatial emission profile. [38] The Irreversible Case…”
Section: à11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[37] In this case, the annihilation reaction can be demonstrated because light emission is an indicator of chemical reactivity and because the distribution of such emission can be studied spatially, for example, at different distances between the generating electrodes, [37] or by optical sampling of the spatial emission profile. [38] The Irreversible Case…”
Section: à11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the ECL intensity distributions recorded experimentally with a confocal microscope reveal significant distortions and specific features which disagree with the theoretical expectations (compare schematic in Figure 1 c with Figure 1 b), [5] even though the microscope optical resolution [9,10] was sufficient for not introducing severe distortions beyond a moderate enlargement of the real ECL peak width. [5] Furthermore, we did not notice significant changes in the signal shape upon decreasing the confocal volume below the size that was selected, except for the deterioration of the signal-tonoise ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…[5] Furthermore, we did not notice significant changes in the signal shape upon decreasing the confocal volume below the size that was selected, except for the deterioration of the signal-tonoise ratio.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations