2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-01309-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping evidence on malnutrition screening tools for children under 5 years in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol

Abstract: Background: In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), malnutrition remains a major public health challenge, particularly among children under 5 years of age. Despite nutritional screening tools being developed and available to detect early malnutrition in under five-year-old children, malnutrition continues to be a health concern. However, the level of evidence on nutritional screening tools for predicting early malnutrition at the community level in a high disease burden setting is unclear. The objective of this scoping r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The methodological pattern used in this scoping review followed Arkey and O'Malley [17], Lecac et al [18], and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) [19]-enhanced framework, recommendations and guidelines, respectively. The steps include the following: (1) identify the research question, (2) identify the relevant study sources, (3) select sources of evidence and eligibility criteria, and (4) chart data [20]. However, the pattern of reporting the results in this scoping review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines [21,22].…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodological pattern used in this scoping review followed Arkey and O'Malley [17], Lecac et al [18], and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) [19]-enhanced framework, recommendations and guidelines, respectively. The steps include the following: (1) identify the research question, (2) identify the relevant study sources, (3) select sources of evidence and eligibility criteria, and (4) chart data [20]. However, the pattern of reporting the results in this scoping review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines [21,22].…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scoping review was tailored along with the enhanced framework of Arkey and O'Malley [8], the recommendations of Lecac et al [9], and guidelines of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) [10]. The five key steps include: (1) research question identification, (2) identification of the relevant study sources, (3) evidence and eligibility criteria selection, (4) data charting, and (5) results collating, summarising, and reporting [11]. However, the pattern of reporting the results in this scoping review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines [12,13].…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%