2021
DOI: 10.1007/s41233-021-00047-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping experience research across disciplines: who, where, when

Abstract: Human experiences have been studied in multiple disciplines, Human–Computer Interaction (HCI) being one of the largest research fields with its user experience (UX) research. Currently, there is little interaction between experience researchers from different disciplines, although cross-disciplinary knowledge sharing has the potential to accelerate the development of UX and other experience research fields to the next level. This article reports a research profiling study of almost 52,000 experience publicatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the collection of information, we have, slightly more than 35% of publications are categorized in Mendeley 35%, 25% in the Google Scholar category, 20% are listed in the ScienceDirect category, 17% in IEEE and ACM categories, 13% in MDPI and SpringerLink categories and a small number in the basis of species that is Taylor Francis 9% (see Figure 4). The distribution of this experience publication is in line with Roto et al [21], whose analysis of the literature created Mendeley's premier publication of human experience (Figure 4). Research starts from the experience dominated by Mendeley.…”
Section: Learning Discipline Experiencesupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the collection of information, we have, slightly more than 35% of publications are categorized in Mendeley 35%, 25% in the Google Scholar category, 20% are listed in the ScienceDirect category, 17% in IEEE and ACM categories, 13% in MDPI and SpringerLink categories and a small number in the basis of species that is Taylor Francis 9% (see Figure 4). The distribution of this experience publication is in line with Roto et al [21], whose analysis of the literature created Mendeley's premier publication of human experience (Figure 4). Research starts from the experience dominated by Mendeley.…”
Section: Learning Discipline Experiencesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This article includes all publications that mention experience in the field of UX Design, and the first such publications appeared in the 2006s. First published in the group data by Roto et al [21] this article is about "cross disciplines with 3W", published in 2021. Researchers share the results of the volume of publications, disciplines, research centers, prolific writers, as well as experiential research publications that are widely published in all research fields.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part of the problem of the human engineering factors is such as underlying the values of the people and their motivation in the work to be interpreted in the system. The second era is usability and user-friendliness [2]. In the second era, people were more aware of the system's usability than its functionality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last era is user experience (UX). The concept of UX was mentioned in 1995 [2]. Moreover, the UX concept has increased dramatically since the mobile technology era.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of the user interface is significant for developing quality applications and should be considered holistically. The User Interface contains specific user interaction components that provide the user with the functionality to communicate with the interactive system [8] [9]. An effective User Interface affects this sense of presence because it can provide convenience and intuition and make it easier for users to receive the desired results from using the system [10].…”
Section: A Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%