Mapping Food Systems: A Participatory Research Tool Tested in Kenya and Bolivia

Jacobi, Johanna; Wambugu, Grace; Ngutu, Mariah; Augstburger, Horacio Florian; Mwangi, Veronica; Zonta, Aymara Llanque; Otieno, Simon Peter Victor; Kiteme, Boniface; Burgoa, José Manuel Freddy Delgado; Rist, Stephan

doi:10.1659/mrd-journal-d-18-00024.1

Cited by 9 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Further articles focusing on sustainability extend the analysis to the entire physical environment and natural resources (the real territory) where power relations occur. They broaden the food-water nexus and resource scarcity/food security perspectives by integrating other analytical dimensions such as time, space, and power (Kharanagh et al 2020), also with in-depth analyses of forms of power (Jacobi and Llanque 2018;Jacobi et al 2019). Framing the food insecurity issue in the wider socio-ecological dimension, these articles suggest that insecurities surrounding water and food are explained by political power and gender relations (Allouche 2011) and that proactively addressing power imbalances by giving voice to marginalized actors in the system (Drimie et al 2018) is the best way to achieve food security while promoting the sustainability of global water and food systems.…”

Section: The Wider Topic Of Sustainable Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Framing Political Issues in Food System Transformative Changes

Sodano

Gorgitano

2022

Social Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper addresses political issues related to policy interventions for food system sustainability. It presents the results of a literature review, which explores how the concept of power has been used so far by scholars of food system dynamics. Articles numbering 116 were subjected to an in-depth qualitative analysis, which allowed the identification of three main strands of the literature with respect to food and power issues: (1) marketing and industrial organisation literature, dealing with the economic power exercised by economic actors in contexts of noncompetitive market structures; (2) articles addressing the power issue from a political economy perspective and by using an interdisciplinary approach; (3) heterogenous studies. The results of the review witness a growing interest for the analysis of food systems, political issues, and the need of a wider use of analytical tools and concepts offered by social sciences for the study of power in sustainability policy design.

show abstract

Section: The Wider Topic Of Sustainable Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Framing Political Issues in Food System Transformative Changes

Sodano

Gorgitano

2022

Social Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…La aplicación del enfoque de cadena de valor en la investigación agroalimentaria ha revelado su impacto en la comprensión de las formas de producción y los actores involucrados. Estrategias como el análisis de la cadena de valor y el mapeo de sistemas alimentarios han demostrado ser funcionales en la mejora de la intervención en cadenas de valor agrícolas (Hainzer et al, 2019;Jacobi et al, 2019). Se destaca el interés en analizar la organización y la interacción entre actores, especialmente en cadenas de valor informales o en desarrollo, con un enfoque en pequeños productores agrícolas (Mishra & Dey, 2018;German et al, 2020).…”

Section: Cadena De Valor Sostenibleunclassified

“…De otro lado, identificar la relevancia de aspectos de inclusión social y buen gobierno en la competitividad de los negocios agroecológicos requiere de la participación activa de las comunidades que hacen parte de dichos negocios, ya que son quienes más conocen el proceso de producción al igual que las partes involucradas. Trabajos similares muestran que la manera más eficiente de involucrar a una comunidad en el estudio de una problemática es a través de la Investigación Acción Participativa (IAP) (Braun et al, 2021;Hassan et al, 2020;Jacobi et al, 2019).…”

Section: Métodounclassified

Value chain in agroecological organizations: analysis from the triple bottom line

Díaz-Ariza,

Aguilar-Galeano

2024

rev. investig. desarro. innov

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

El objetivo es analizar la agricultura ecológica como parte de la bioeconomía, con énfasis en la triple base. La metodología es cualitativa, utilizando la Investigación Acción Participativa con comunidades de productores agroecológicos en Tenjo y Tibacuy, Cundinamarca. Se encontró que en la dimensión económica, los productores emplean estrategias como el trueque, circuitos cortos y la producción de insumos propios. Sin embargo, la falta de seguimiento de costos y la ausencia de una marca consolidada son debilidades identificadas. En la dimensión ambiental, se destaca la producción de insumos biológicos y prácticas sostenibles, aunque se señala el uso de envases no sostenibles como una debilidad. La falta de seguimiento de la huella ecológica se identifica como un aspecto a mejorar. En la dimensión social, la agroecología fortalece la comunidad a través del trueque, mercados campesinos y generación de empleo. Sin embargo, la falta de certificación, participación limitada en redes y escaso relevo generacional representan desafíos sociales.

show abstract

“…Previous research has highlighted that private and public interests in the domain of food are not necessarily aligned (Poole et al 2020) and that intermediate analytical steps are needed to identify which chain links and actors to target to improve the performance of food systems (Borman et al 2022;Jacobi et al 2019) -here defined as the extent to which the food system produces the desired outcomes. More comprehensively, a recent critical assessment of food systems approaches concludes that the approaches and their application remain rather descriptive and generic, seldomly address stakeholder interests, relationships, and governance structures, and therefore provide little actionable insight into how to effectuate system change .…”

Section: Figure 2 Simplistic Visualization Of Change In Value Chain A...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding the mechanisms to strengthen food systems through value chain-driven action

Vernooij¹,

Oostewechel²,

Verschoor³

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Food system frameworks and approaches are increasingly informing researchers, development practitioners, and policymakers on the sustainable and equitable development of food production, consumption, and the systemic context of these activities. However, there is a disconnect between food systems thinking and decision-making by private organizations in the food value chains themselves, who are indispensable in realizing food system change. Based on a review of food systems frameworks, we identify three drivers of this disconnect, namely (1) misalignment of public and private goals, (2) a mismatch between macro-level and meso-and micro-level activities and interventions, and (3) ultimately identify a need to make food system approaches relevant for value chain actors. Subsequently, based on interviews with actors in the research and policy domains as well as in private companies, we explore if this disconnect may be bridged. In doing so, we distinguish between smallholders, micro-, small-, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs), and large companies in the private sector. These actors vary considerably in terms of size, scope, resources and capabilities, take up a different position in the food system, and therefore also require different approaches to leverage their potential for food system change. We close with a discussion of several examples (from around the world) of successful efforts to leverage value chain action for the improvement of food system outcomes. Interview guide public sector partiesTo share beforehand: this interview guide Opening Thanks for your time, we do this interview to answer the following research question:How can we better help private sector actors with food chain optimization through a 'Food Systems' approach?A Food Systems (FS) approach includes social, economic and environmental aspects that food chains interact with. Namely, in addition to processes in chains themselves, attention is paid to causes and consequences that take place outside the food chain, for example in policy or the climate. A FS approach is different from more linear value chain analyses through its, as the name already implicates, systemic lense. Your answers will be processed anonymously. Interview guide researchers/client supportTo share beforehand: this interview guide Prerequisite for participation: experience with Food Systems approaches Opening Thanks for your time, we do this interview to answer the following research question:How can we better help private sector actors with food chain optimization through a 'Food Systems' approach?A Food Systems (FS) approach includes social, economic and environmental aspects that food chains interact with. Namely, in addition to processes in chains themselves, attention is paid to causes and consequences that take place outside the food chain, for example in policy or the climate. A FS approach is different from more linear value chain analyses through its, as the name already implicates, systemic lense. Your answers will be processed anonymously.

show abstract

Mapping Food Systems: A Participatory Research Tool Tested in Kenya and Bolivia

Cited by 9 publications

References 18 publications

Framing Political Issues in Food System Transformative Changes

Framing Political Issues in Food System Transformative Changes

Value chain in agroecological organizations: analysis from the triple bottom line

Understanding the mechanisms to strengthen food systems through value chain-driven action

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About