2001
DOI: 10.1016/s1464-1895(01)00085-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping function induced bias in tropospheric delay estimation using GPS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The difficulties of spatially and temporally correlated observation errors have generally been circumvented in data assimilation by applying thinning of data, or through observation processing algorithms that are assumed to remove the observation error correlations (Stewart et al, 2013). Methods have been developed to account for serially correlated errors (Järvinen et al, 1999), but there is certainly room for improvement regarding spatially correlated errors, although some general research within this area has been carried out (Lin et al, 2000;Liu and Rabier, 2002;Bormann and Bauer, 2010;Stewart et al, 2013). Some studies have focused on GNSS ZTD observations (Kleijer, 2001;Stoew, 2004;Eresmaa and Järvi-nen, 2005), but the handling of the correlated observation errors is still an active area of research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difficulties of spatially and temporally correlated observation errors have generally been circumvented in data assimilation by applying thinning of data, or through observation processing algorithms that are assumed to remove the observation error correlations (Stewart et al, 2013). Methods have been developed to account for serially correlated errors (Järvinen et al, 1999), but there is certainly room for improvement regarding spatially correlated errors, although some general research within this area has been carried out (Lin et al, 2000;Liu and Rabier, 2002;Bormann and Bauer, 2010;Stewart et al, 2013). Some studies have focused on GNSS ZTD observations (Kleijer, 2001;Stoew, 2004;Eresmaa and Järvi-nen, 2005), but the handling of the correlated observation errors is still an active area of research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods have been developed to account for serially correlated errors (Järvinen et al, 1999), but there is certainly room for improvement regarding spatially correlated errors, although some general research within this area has been carried out (Lin et al, 2000;Liu and Rabier, 2002;Bormann and Bauer, 2010;Stewart et al, 2013). Some studies have focused on GNSS ZTD observations (Kleijer, 2001;Stoew, 2004;Eresmaa and Järvi-nen, 2005), but the handling of the correlated observation errors is still an active area of research. GNSS ZTD observations processed by the NGAA centre have been used within the MetCoOp forecasting system, aiming at improving short-range forecasts of, in particular, moisture, clouds and precipitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the horizontal gradients is also limited, because they can only consider a linear asymmetry of the troposphere around the geodetic site [26]. Kleijer [27] analyzed that significant biases can be introduced in the estimated ZWD when the atmosphere is not symmetrical. However, the suggestion of using an accurate wet mapping function is still limited by the assumption of the homogeneous troposphere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difficulties of spatially and temporally correlated observation errors have generally been circumvented in data assimilation by applying thinning of data, or through observation processing algorithms that are assumed to remove the observation error correlations (Stewart et al, 2013). Methods have been developed to account for serially correlated errors (Järvinen et al, 1999), but there is certainly room for improvement regarding spatially correlated errors, although some general research within this area has been carried out (Lin et al, 2000;Liu and Rabier, 2002;Bormann and Bauer, 2010;Stewart et al, 2013). Some studies have focused on GNSS ZTD observations (Kleijer, 2001;Stoew, 2004;Eresmaa and Järvinen, 2005), but the handling of the correlated observation errors is still an active area of research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%