2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2004.00142.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping global fisheries: sharpening our focus

Abstract: Mapping global landings is an important prerequisite for examining causal relationships between fishing and ecological change. Landing statistics, typically provided with poor spatial precision, can be disaggregated into a grid system of spatial cells (30 min ×30 min) using a rule‐based approach and ancillary data about distributions of fished taxa and fishing access of reporting countries. Presentation of time series catch composition is then possible for many types of marine areas including biogeochemical pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
190
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
190
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Landings were mapped by the Sea Around Us project (Watson et al 2004) to infer landings of both domestic and foreign vessels in each EEZ. Here, we examined nine countries with the highest reported landings, representing 50 % of the landings globally (excluding High Seas: Canada, Chile, China, India, Japan, Norway, Peru, the UK, and the US), to determine the effect of mapping inaccuracies on fisheries status estimates.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Landings were mapped by the Sea Around Us project (Watson et al 2004) to infer landings of both domestic and foreign vessels in each EEZ. Here, we examined nine countries with the highest reported landings, representing 50 % of the landings globally (excluding High Seas: Canada, Chile, China, India, Japan, Norway, Peru, the UK, and the US), to determine the effect of mapping inaccuracies on fisheries status estimates.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency of sustainable or overfished L indexes allowed us to calculate the probability of sustainability (P sust ) for any particular L index value as P sust L index ð ÞÑ , where N is the number of models in which L indexes lead to sustainable or overfishing conditions. Probabilities of fisheries sustainability were calculated for each EEZ in the world using catch data as from the Sea Around Us fisheries database, which contains harmonized data from a variety of sources including the Food and Agriculture Organization (i.e., statistics on fisheries catches from 1950 to 2004; [44]). That database adjusted landings data to account for the fishing of long-distance fishing fleets (i.e., landings that are reported by one country, but fished in a different one).…”
Section: Quantification Of Fisheries Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the world's important fisheries are more concentrated in higher latitudes 32 (Watson et al, 2004), research on the processes governing larval fish survival (including trophic-33 related processes) has also been historically concentrated in high latitudes. In lower latitudes, 34 aside from work on large pelagic species, there has been a relatively greater focus on transport-35 related processes and the implications for population connectivity, rather than on what might 36 influence the survival of the larvae en route during the planktonic period (Cowen and Sponaugle, 37 1997).…”
Section: Introduction 24mentioning
confidence: 99%