2020
DOI: 10.5194/amt-13-2209-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping ice formation to mineral-surface topography using a micro mixing chamber with video and atomic-force microscopy

Abstract: Abstract. We developed a method for examining ice formation on solid substrates exposed to cloud-like atmospheres. Our experimental approach couples video-rate optical microscopy of ice formation with high-resolution atomic-force microscopy (AFM) of the initial mineral surface. We demonstrate how colocating stitched AFM images with video microscopy can be used to relate the likelihood of ice formation to nanoscale properties of a mineral substrate, e.g., the abundance of surface steps of a certain height. We a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because heterogeneous ice nucleation is fundamentally a process that occurs on particle surfaces, surface topological features (Friddle & Thürmer, 2020) and variations in surface composition have an effect on the observed ice nucleation properties. Achieving greater insight into the relationship between particle surface properties and their ice nucleation activity can improve understanding of how the differences in ice‐nucleating efficiency between different material arise.…”
Section: Ice Nucleation Parameterizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because heterogeneous ice nucleation is fundamentally a process that occurs on particle surfaces, surface topological features (Friddle & Thürmer, 2020) and variations in surface composition have an effect on the observed ice nucleation properties. Achieving greater insight into the relationship between particle surface properties and their ice nucleation activity can improve understanding of how the differences in ice‐nucleating efficiency between different material arise.…”
Section: Ice Nucleation Parameterizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This experiment indicates that ice formed on a small protrusion located on the feldspar surface. As the authors point out, the INAS cannot be directly determined due to limited resolution [Friddle and Thürmer, 2020]. For example, the scale of the identified protrusion (Fig.…”
Section: Multimodal Microanalysis Of Ice Nucleationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculations based on particle distributions in droplets (Wright and Petters, 2013;Harrison et al, 2016) assume that ice active sites are distributed evenly across the surface of a material, that the material is suspended evenly throughout the droplet, and possibly (depending on the specific approach) that the material is composed of uniform spheres and that ice nucleation is time-independent or the characteristic temperatures for each given ice nucleation site are normally distributed. The first assumption is known to be false for some materials; minerals often have higher concentrations of and/or more ice active IN sites near or in specific nanoscale defects, cracks, pores, or other specific regions such as the perthitic textures in some feldspar minerals (Whale et al, 2017;Kiselev et al, 2017;Holden et al, 2019;Friddle and Thürmer, 2020). The second assumption may or may not be true, especially at higher suspension concentrations (Beydoun et al, 2016).…”
Section: Parametric Bootstrapping and Its Shortcomingsmentioning
confidence: 99%