2009
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2638584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping Indian Districts Across Census Years, 1971-2001

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, we have completely excluded Hyderabad from our analysis. 7 For more details about changes in district boundaries over time, see Kumar and Somanathan (2009). There are two main features of data used in this research. First, we use high-resolution daily gridded temperature and climate data for India, which have not been exploited much in climate change and agriculture research.…”
Section: Data Set and Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, we have completely excluded Hyderabad from our analysis. 7 For more details about changes in district boundaries over time, see Kumar and Somanathan (2009). There are two main features of data used in this research. First, we use high-resolution daily gridded temperature and climate data for India, which have not been exploited much in climate change and agriculture research.…”
Section: Data Set and Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 624 districts in 2008, 171 (27%) had unchanged boundaries, 165 (24%) were cleanly partitioned, and 288 (46%) were adjacent districts that underwent complex boundary changes. Following procedures for weighting from Kumar and Somanathan (2009), we created a DISE dataset of matched districts or district composites that were unchanged since 1981. These procedures yielded a dataset of 328 districts and district composites (hereafter called district composites), accounting for all 624 districts of India in 2008.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For those common cases whereby an old district was split into multiple ones, we simply need to consolidate the new ones. For a few more complex cases whereby a new district was formed by parts carved out from multiple old districts, we partition the new districts using population weights developed in Kumar and Somanathan (2009), and merge the parts to their original districts.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%