2018
DOI: 10.1111/ejn.13814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping international impact of Danish neuroscience from 2004 to 2015 using tailored scientometric methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have thus avoided an unwanted evaluation of ‘ascending’ young scientists. Fortunately, the Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy at Aarhus University and the Lundbeck Foundation recently published a mapping of the international impact of Danish Neuroscience from 2004 to 2015 (Andersen et al, 2018). The purpose was to assess the standing—using tailored scientometric methodology—of Danish neuroscience in relation to a number of world leading neuroscience countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have thus avoided an unwanted evaluation of ‘ascending’ young scientists. Fortunately, the Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy at Aarhus University and the Lundbeck Foundation recently published a mapping of the international impact of Danish Neuroscience from 2004 to 2015 (Andersen et al, 2018). The purpose was to assess the standing—using tailored scientometric methodology—of Danish neuroscience in relation to a number of world leading neuroscience countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initiative for the present work was taken by the Lundbeck Foundation, which approached us proposing that we write an overview over the topic. The Lundbeck Foundation, the largest Danish foundation supporting neuroscience, had previously made an overview of present Danish neuroscience publications (Andersen et al, 2018) and was also inspired by the Federation of European Neuroscience Societies (FENS). FENS, through its History Committee, is interested in documenting the development of neuroscience in all its member states (https://www.fens.org/engagement/outreach/history-of-neuroscience).…”
Section: Prefacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van Eck and Waltman formulated this software, which permitted us to design and visualize networks based on bibliometric data (Van Eck & Waltman, 2010. Its extensive use in bibliometric studies is evidenced by efficiency (Doleck & Lajoje, 2017), multicriteria judgment (Want Zhang & Zhang, 2018), neurology (Andersen et al, 2018), the social responsibility of companies (Lulewicz-Sas, 2017), and management systems (Ozkose & Gencer, 2017).…”
Section: Data and Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%