Mapping invasive woody species in coastal dunes in the Netherlands: a remote sensing approach using LIDAR and high‐resolution aerial photographs

Abstract

Questions Does remote sensing improve classification of invasive woody species in dunes, useful for shrub management? Does additional height information and an object‐based classifier increase woody species classification accuracy? Location The dunes of Vlieland, one of the Wadden Sea Islands, the Netherlands. Methods Extensive monitoring using optical remote sensing and LIDAR deliver large amounts of high‐quality data to observe and manage coastal dunes as a defence against the sea in the Netherlands. Using these additional data could increase the accuracy of vegetation mapping and monitoring in coastal areas. In this study, a remote sensing approach has been developed to deliver detailed and standardized maps of (invasive) woody species in the dunes of Vlieland using multispectral aerial photographs and vegetation height derived from LIDAR. Three classification methods were used: maximum likelihood (ML) classification using aerial photographs, ML classification combined with vegetation heights derived from LIDAR (ML+) and object‐based (OB) classification. Results The use of vegetation height from the LIDAR data increased the overall classification accuracy from 39% to 50%, but particularly improved classification of the taller woody species. The object‐based classification increased the overall accuracy of the ML+ from 50% to 60%. The object‐based results are comparable to human visual analysis while offering automated analysis. Conclusions Overall, the object‐based classification delivers detailed maps of the woody species that are useful for management and evaluation of alien and invasive species in dune ecosystems.

Combining Airborne Laser Scanning and Aerial Imagery Enhances Echo Classification for Invasive Conifer Detection

“…Airborne laser scanning (ALS) offers the appealing advantage of providing precise elevation and structural data from vegetation returns, which makes it well suited to the detection of taller isolated trees in otherwise short-stature vegetation types [19,20], and the combination of height and structural information derived from LiDAR data with imagery has been shown to improve the identification of invasive species [21,22]. The literature on identifying invasive conifers in New Zealand's unique environment using remote sensing techniques is not well developed, and we are unaware of efforts to use ALS for invasive conifer detection in this context.…”

Remote sensing for biodiversity monitoring: a review of methods for biodiversity indicator extraction and assessment of progress towards international targets

“…finer-than the monitored object, to provide an effective tradeoff between within-object and between-object variance (Nagendra 2001). Some of the best performing studies in alien and invasive species detection are based on fine resolution data, either aerial (Dorigo et al 2012;Shouse et al 2013;Artigas and Pechmann 2010;Hantson et al 2012;Clark and Roberts 2012;Colgan et al 2012) or satellite (Laba et al 2008;Walsh et al 2008;Immitzer et al 2012). Dorigo et al (2012) extracted a bi-temporal band ratio (BTBR) and a number of Haralick texture features from bi-seasonal digital orthophotos and successfully detected Fallopia japonica, one of the world's worst invasive alien species, with up to 90.3% PA and 98.1% UA.…”

Categorizing Grassland Vegetation with Full-Waveform Airborne Laser Scanning: A Feasibility Study for Detecting Natura 2000 Habitat Types

“…LIDAR was first used for such purposes in forests, where vegetation height and canopy structure are more diverse [66], but applications in shrublands [67,68] and wetlands were also successful [69][70][71][72]. LIDAR is increasingly used for mapping conservation relevant variables, including coverage of different species or associations for biodiversity assessment [73,74], but also human activities or natural environmental variables relevant for habitat quality [46]. Meanwhile, one of the major advantages of LIDAR compared to airborne multi-or hyperspectral data is the versatile use of such data, which has led to more widespread surveys and easier data access than the case for passive multi-or hyperspectral airborne surveys.…”