2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.113912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping LUCAS topsoil chemical properties at European scale using Gaussian process regression

Abstract: This paper presents the second part of the mapping of topsoil properties based on the Land Use and Cover Area frame Survey (LUCAS). The first part described the physical properties (Ballabio et al., 2016) while this second part includes the following chemical properties: pH, Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC), calcium carbonates (CaCO3), C:N ratio, nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K). The LUCAS survey collected harmonised data on changes in land cover and the state of land use for the European Union (EU… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
122
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(61 reference statements)
4
122
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed over or underestimation of pH values is relatively low compared to other soil pH mapping studies using satellite data [10]. The relative lower error may be a result of the higher spatial resolution of Sentinel input data compared to the Landsat information used in previous studies [10], but may also result from the focus on soils under intensive agricultural management in our dataset and the use of soil only information in the prediction algorithm. An independent validation analysis was conducted on the second sampling campaign for pH detection on the "Stadtfeld" field, including a total number of 76 samples.…”
Section: Soil Property Predictionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The observed over or underestimation of pH values is relatively low compared to other soil pH mapping studies using satellite data [10]. The relative lower error may be a result of the higher spatial resolution of Sentinel input data compared to the Landsat information used in previous studies [10], but may also result from the focus on soils under intensive agricultural management in our dataset and the use of soil only information in the prediction algorithm. An independent validation analysis was conducted on the second sampling campaign for pH detection on the "Stadtfeld" field, including a total number of 76 samples.…”
Section: Soil Property Predictionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Today, remote sensing data from satellites allow gathering spectral and temporal information. Such data help to interpret not only crop vitality (chlorophyll content) [6,7] and productivity (biomass) [8] but also soil properties, including physical (texture) [9], chemical (pH value or nutrient contents) [10], and biological (soil organic carbon) [11] properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, efforts to produce appropriate predictors to explain the spatial distribution of soil attributes (at detail and generalization) increases the accuracy of the models. Various covariates (e.g., climate, terrain attributes and RS data) representing soil state factors have been widely used in statistical models to predict soil texture, bulk density, organic carbon, nutrients (Ca, Mg, K, Na, N, P), available water capacity, pH and CEC [4,17,22,[34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Preparing Soil Covariatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The databases for each predictor variables are listed in Table 1. Detailed information about the databases Yang et al, 2013;Hengl et al, 2017;Sun et al, 2017;Ballabio et al, 2019 Net primary productivity NPP MODIS-NPP (MOD17A3; mean value during 2000-2014)…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%