Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Application-Specific Systems, Architectures and Processors
DOI: 10.1109/asap.1997.606834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping multirate dataflow to complex RT level hardware models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For hardware synthesis, a similar approach can be taken, with blocks implementing their functionality in a hardware description language, like behavioral VHSIC hardware descripton language (VHDL) [12], [34]. The generated VHDL description can then be used by a behavioral synthesis tools to generate a register transfer level (RTL) description of the system that can be further compiled into hardware using logic synthesis and layout tools.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For hardware synthesis, a similar approach can be taken, with blocks implementing their functionality in a hardware description language, like behavioral VHSIC hardware descripton language (VHDL) [12], [34]. The generated VHDL description can then be used by a behavioral synthesis tools to generate a register transfer level (RTL) description of the system that can be further compiled into hardware using logic synthesis and layout tools.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But this hardware overhead is much smaller than that of parallel implementation. One difficulty of this approach is to generate numerous control signals whose timings are computed statically through rigorous graph analysis [8]. Another limitation is that all hardware blocks should have deterministic and fixed execution cycles for static timing analysis and controller synthesis.…”
Section: Previous Work and Motivational Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synchronous reactive systems [5] and cyclostatic dataflow (CSDF) [6] provide more of a front-end view of the problem: They deal with logical modeling of the timing and are more concerned with verifying the functionality. The RT-level model proposed in [3] provides an interesting approach to the problem of multirate timing and interfacing but requires a master clock that is potentially much faster than any of the data rates in the system in order to synchronize the interfaces. Models such as the processor timing data used in [7] capture the effects of real system parameters and latency for single rate systems, but they do not provide ways to take advantage of skewed clock phases or multirate graphs directly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%