2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping of Defects in Individual Silicon Nanocrystals Using Real-Space Spectroscopy

Abstract: The photophysical properties of silicon semiconductor nanocrystals (SiNCs) are extremely sensitive to the presence of surface chemical defects, many of which are easily produced by oxidation under ambient conditions. The diversity of chemical structures of such defects and the lack of tools capable of probing individual defects continue to impede understanding of the roles of these defects in SiNC photophysics. We use scanning tunneling spectroscopy to study the impact of surface defects on the electronic stru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, close inspection of the d I /d V maps in Figure shows that the intragap states appear to have filament-like structures, contrary to the expected quantum-confined states in crystalline SiNCs, but in-line with expectations for amorphous silicon. , Another line of evidence for the presence of amorphous silicon is provided by LDOS mapping: the band edges for bistable SiNCs typically show onsets that fluctuate noticeably across the SiNC surface (Figure ), while crystalline SiNCs show band onsets that are independent of location . Consistent with these findings, STM images of bistable SiNCs did not show any obvious crystallographic features, in contrast to SiNCs without bistable states, where evidence of faceting was found in STM imaging . These observations suggest that different SiNCs may have amorphous surface layers of varied thicknesses resulting in varied electronic structures.…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For example, close inspection of the d I /d V maps in Figure shows that the intragap states appear to have filament-like structures, contrary to the expected quantum-confined states in crystalline SiNCs, but in-line with expectations for amorphous silicon. , Another line of evidence for the presence of amorphous silicon is provided by LDOS mapping: the band edges for bistable SiNCs typically show onsets that fluctuate noticeably across the SiNC surface (Figure ), while crystalline SiNCs show band onsets that are independent of location . Consistent with these findings, STM images of bistable SiNCs did not show any obvious crystallographic features, in contrast to SiNCs without bistable states, where evidence of faceting was found in STM imaging . These observations suggest that different SiNCs may have amorphous surface layers of varied thicknesses resulting in varied electronic structures.…”
supporting
confidence: 66%
“…14 Consistent with these findings, STM images of bistable SiNCs did not show any obvious crystallographic features, in contrast to SiNCs without bistable states, where evidence of faceting was found in STM imaging. 14 These observations suggest that different SiNCs may have amorphous surface layers of varied thicknesses resulting in varied electronic structures. Nevertheless, the bistable SiNCs are likely not entirely amorphous because two-dimensional (2-D) LDOS maps (such as the ones shown in Figure 3) show features that appear to have specific orientations (as can be seen, for example, from the boundaries of the bistable areas), which could be explained only by the presence of a substantial amount of crystalline material.…”
Section: The Journal Of Physical Chemistry Lettersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The on-going quest for faster switching, higher density, and better performance, predicted by Moore’s law, has led to persistent downscaling of nanoelectronic devices. Shrinking the device dimensions increases their surface-to-volume ratio and introduces atomic-scale disorder at boundaries and interfaces, , reducing performance and threatening to limit scaling. To avoid these issues, the nanoelectronics community has turned to intrinsically two-dimensional (2D) material platforms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%