1994
DOI: 10.1109/36.312893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping of forest types in Alaskan boreal forests using SAR imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Study areas, the species investigated, and the number of training and validation samples differed substantially between the studies. Nevertheless, our achieved accuracies were comparable to other studies classifying deciduous and coniferous forests using even fully polarimetric C-band SAR data [16,83,84]. Compared with other technologies such as airborne laser scanning (OA of 89-96% and κ = 0.61 − 0.92) [85][86][87] or imaging spectrometer data (OA of 83-99% and κ = 0.73 − 0.98) [88][89][90], our forest type classification performance (OA of 86% and κ = 0.73) was not as competitive.…”
Section: Classification Of Forest Types and Speciessupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Study areas, the species investigated, and the number of training and validation samples differed substantially between the studies. Nevertheless, our achieved accuracies were comparable to other studies classifying deciduous and coniferous forests using even fully polarimetric C-band SAR data [16,83,84]. Compared with other technologies such as airborne laser scanning (OA of 89-96% and κ = 0.61 − 0.92) [85][86][87] or imaging spectrometer data (OA of 83-99% and κ = 0.73 − 0.98) [88][89][90], our forest type classification performance (OA of 86% and κ = 0.73) was not as competitive.…”
Section: Classification Of Forest Types and Speciessupporting
confidence: 74%
“…To use SAR data for large-area forest mapping purposes, the sensitivity of the measurements to environmental and weather effects, such as precipitation and the associated canopy and soil moisture variations or freeze/thaw transitions, need to be accounted for [27,29,[62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73]. Ideally, models relating radar measurements to the forest biophysical attribute of interest are calibrated adaptively to account for temporal and spatial variations in the imaging conditions [15,18,19].…”
Section: Spatial Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then for each pixel χ, we define the non-empty sets of the mass functions based on the statistical parameters above, as expressed in (8) …”
Section: High-level Fusion Using Dempster-shafer Evidence Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SAR as an active sensor offers all-weather, day/night coverage imaging capability, and it can also yield information on the underlying structure of land cover, particularly, woodland and grassland. Many studies have been conducted using SAR techniques, e.g., woodland classification, extraction and mapping [3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%