2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12955-018-1003-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping of the Gastrointestinal Short Form Questionnaire (GSF-Q) into EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

Abstract: BackgroundThe short, self-administered Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) Symptom Frequency Questionnaire (GSFQ) is a specific Quality of Life (QoL) instrument which measures the impact of GERD symptoms on QoL. This study aims to map the specific scores in GSFQ into two generic instruments: SF-6D and EQ-5D-3 L, in order to obtain utility estimates derived from the GERD condition.MethodA national representative sample of GERD patients was selected, stratified by gender, age (< 45, ≥45 years) and GERD severi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Allowing freeform reporting of symptoms in addition to a structured questionnaire may provide a more robust symptom profile in reflux disease. There is evidence in literature that structured questionnaires are very helpful and effective for symptom evaluation, and this is confirmed by our study [41][42][43][44][45][46]. Several instruments have been published, validated, and successfully used in clinical practice [41][42][43][44][45][46].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Allowing freeform reporting of symptoms in addition to a structured questionnaire may provide a more robust symptom profile in reflux disease. There is evidence in literature that structured questionnaires are very helpful and effective for symptom evaluation, and this is confirmed by our study [41][42][43][44][45][46]. Several instruments have been published, validated, and successfully used in clinical practice [41][42][43][44][45][46].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…There is evidence in literature that structured questionnaires are very helpful and effective for symptom evaluation, and this is confirmed by our study [41][42][43][44][45][46]. Several instruments have been published, validated, and successfully used in clinical practice [41][42][43][44][45][46]. Various questionnaires published include the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Symptom Severity Index, the Gastrointestinal Rating Scale, the Chinese GERD Questionnaire, the GERD-Health Related Quality of Life Instrument, the Esophageal Symptoms Questionnaire, and the Reflux Disease Questionnaire [41][42][43][47][48][49][50].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Categorical regression with optimal scaling produced the most consistent model for the prediction of SF‐6Dv2‐derived utility value. With a MAE of 0.0811, the final model is similar to those from SF‐6D mapping studies for comparable diseases 17,27,28 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…With a MAE of 0.0811, the final model is similar to those from SF-6D mapping studies for comparable diseases. 17,27,28 There is no universal approach to choosing the right regression technique to predict utility. 3 Here, seven different regression techniques were used to cope with various potential issues relating to the dependent variable such as outliers, heteroscedasticity, skewness, and ceiling effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of GERD in Ukraine ranges from 11.1-30% [11]. But clinicians emphasize that the given statistical results do not correspond with reality: such patients are much more, because almost a quarter of patients with complaints of GERD (usually heartburn) do not visit the doctors [12]. This is explained both to the young age of patients who first had the disease, and the lack of knowledge about the symptoms and signs of the disease [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%