2005
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.02386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping of the interface between leptin and the leptin receptor CRH2 domain

Abstract: Despite the impact of the leptin system on body weight and other physiologic processes, little is known about the binding of leptin to its receptor. The extracellular domain of the leptin receptor consists of two cytokine receptor homology (CRH) domains separated by an immunoglobulin-like domain, and followed by two juxtamembrane fibronectin type III modules. The CRH2 domain functions as a high-affinity binding site for leptin, and we previously demonstrated interaction with helices A and C of leptin. In this … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
59
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
11
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also possible that the 223R LepR does not dimerize as efficiently as WT LepR and that this reduces basal activation in the absence of ligand. These possibilities warrant further investigation, as previous studies have shown that the domain of LepR containing the Q223R polymorphism is dispensable for leptin binding (35,36,48). Thus, while we have shown that the biological impact of the Q223R polymorphism on amebiasis is likely via reduced levels of STAT3 transcription, the mechanism by which this occurs remains unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is also possible that the 223R LepR does not dimerize as efficiently as WT LepR and that this reduces basal activation in the absence of ligand. These possibilities warrant further investigation, as previous studies have shown that the domain of LepR containing the Q223R polymorphism is dispensable for leptin binding (35,36,48). Thus, while we have shown that the biological impact of the Q223R polymorphism on amebiasis is likely via reduced levels of STAT3 transcription, the mechanism by which this occurs remains unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The plasmids mLEPRb/pCDNA3 (47), mLEPRbR223/pCDNA3 (35), and LEPRbDelta65/pCDNA3 (47) were obtained from Martin Myers and have been described previously as referenced. pCDNA3 was used as a vector control.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5) are structurally similar and face the same orientation, and they are most likely involved in interacting with CHR2. Mutations of those residues, such as D9S, T12Q, K15S, T16N, R20N, Q75S, N82S, D85S and L86A, L86S, L86N, and L86Q, significantly lowered the affinity of leptin for CHR2 and affected both binding and leptin receptor signaling (4,5). To date, no report regarding the putative role of Asp-23 has been published; nevertheless, our data (see Table 3) strongly indicate that replacement of Asp-23 by any non-negatively charged amino acid is sufficient to increase affinity for hLBD (CHR2) and subsequent biological activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different theories about the origin of obesity have been proposed, one of these theories is the phenomenon called Leptin resistance and it is related to the pathologically increase of Leptin (LEP) levels due to saturation of the transport of this hormone in obese persons (Banks et al, 1996;Bjorbaek et al, 1999;Bahrenberg et al, 2002;Scarpace et al, 2005;Myers et al, 2010;Fuentes et al, 2010). The interaction of Leptin with its receptor has been investigated through amino acid replacements and deletion experiments demonstrating that some regions affect the LEP-LEPR interaction (Bahrenberg et al, 2002;Devos et al, 1997;Fong et al, 1998;Iserentant et al, 2005;Peelman et al, 2004;. Therefore, Leptin resistance could be related to mutations and SNPs of Leptin receptor gene (lepr) and recently associated to increase risk of insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome (Bjorbaek et al, 1999;Bjorbaek et al, 1997;Enriori et al, 2006;Phillips et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%