2022
DOI: 10.1017/s001041752200038x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping Oysters and Making Oceans in the Northern Indian Ocean, 1880–1906

Abstract: At the turn of the twentieth century, most of the world’s pearls were extracted from rich oyster and coral reefs on the northern Indian Ocean rim. This paper returns to the sites of extraction, studying imperial maps made from 1889–1925 to delineate oyster reefs on the seafloor. Building from the submarine up, I draw on environmental, animal, and history of science studies to explore the work of mapping oceanic, animate space. Attending to the role of divers, whose labor was required to make the seafloor visib… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…64 Among scholars modeling this approach, Tamara Fernando writes a "below the waterline" account of an Indian Ocean pearl fishery in which Gulf of Mannar divers and British colonial mapmakers constructed competing seafloor cartographies in conjunction with oceanic currents, sharks, parasitic tapeworms, and bivalves. 65 This spatial shift decenters laboratories, salons, and universities as the emblematic sites of science, taking us instead to sites like the ocean floor and making it easier to see scientific work mobilized across the widest spectrum of conditions: by freely made contract and violent extraction, with and without remuneration, through the market and within the household. The diversity of labor relations that science entails reflects the diversity of the spaces where it is practiced.…”
Section: The Political Economy Of Science As/and Labormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…64 Among scholars modeling this approach, Tamara Fernando writes a "below the waterline" account of an Indian Ocean pearl fishery in which Gulf of Mannar divers and British colonial mapmakers constructed competing seafloor cartographies in conjunction with oceanic currents, sharks, parasitic tapeworms, and bivalves. 65 This spatial shift decenters laboratories, salons, and universities as the emblematic sites of science, taking us instead to sites like the ocean floor and making it easier to see scientific work mobilized across the widest spectrum of conditions: by freely made contract and violent extraction, with and without remuneration, through the market and within the household. The diversity of labor relations that science entails reflects the diversity of the spaces where it is practiced.…”
Section: The Political Economy Of Science As/and Labormentioning
confidence: 99%