2020
DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.0c00242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping Protein–Protein Interaction Interface Peptides with Jun-Fos Assisted Phage Display and Deep Sequencing

Abstract: Protein−protein interactions govern many cellular processes, and identifying binding interaction sites on proteins can facilitate the discovery of inhibitors to block such interactions.Here we identify peptides from a randomly fragmented plasmid encoding the β-lactamase inhibitory protein (BLIP) and the Lac repressor (LacI) that represent regions of protein−protein interactions. We utilized a Jun-Fos-assisted phage display system that has previously been used to screen cDNA and genomic libraries to identify an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the peptides were fused at the C‐terminus of the display protein and displayed on the phage surface via the interaction of Fos‐peptide with Jun‐gene III protein. Three regions of BLIP were enriched after affinity selection of the Jun‐Fos assisted phage display library for binding TEM‐1 β‐lactamase and included BLIP Ala25−Asp49, Lys72−Thr92, and Gly154−Val165 [61] . These regions are also localized at the BLIP‐β‐lactamase binding interface and the synthesized peptides encompassing the regions were shown to bind TEM‐1 β‐lactamase in the low micromolar range; [61] however, they are different regions than those identified here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, the peptides were fused at the C‐terminus of the display protein and displayed on the phage surface via the interaction of Fos‐peptide with Jun‐gene III protein. Three regions of BLIP were enriched after affinity selection of the Jun‐Fos assisted phage display library for binding TEM‐1 β‐lactamase and included BLIP Ala25−Asp49, Lys72−Thr92, and Gly154−Val165 [61] . These regions are also localized at the BLIP‐β‐lactamase binding interface and the synthesized peptides encompassing the regions were shown to bind TEM‐1 β‐lactamase in the low micromolar range; [61] however, they are different regions than those identified here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three regions of BLIP were enriched after affinity selection of the Jun‐Fos assisted phage display library for binding TEM‐1 β‐lactamase and included BLIP Ala25−Asp49, Lys72−Thr92, and Gly154−Val165 [61] . These regions are also localized at the BLIP‐β‐lactamase binding interface and the synthesized peptides encompassing the regions were shown to bind TEM‐1 β‐lactamase in the low micromolar range; [61] however, they are different regions than those identified here. Thus, the peptides selected in the competitive phage display process are likely to depend on the how the library peptides are presented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The inserts with a count of 5 or above were selected for the coverage score determination. Coverage scores were determined using the bedtools genomecov program and were defined as the per-nucleotide number of occurrences for each insert after alignment to the reference genome: pKS-NV68 plasmid for the GI.1 experiments and pKS-SagaFpA50 plasmid for the GII.4 HOV experiments 27 , 28 , 94 . The inserts that are in-frame to GI.1 and GII.4 HOV ORF1 to ORF3 in the pKS-NV68 and pKS-SagaFpA50 plasmids were determined and counted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%