2018
DOI: 10.1190/geo2017-0297.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping sand layers in clayey till using crosshole ground-penetrating radar

Abstract: Fluid transport through clayey tills governs the quantity and quality of groundwater resources in the Northern hemisphere. This transport is often controlled by a three-dimensional network of macropores (biopores, fractures and sand lenses) within the clayey till. At present, a non-destructive technique that can map and characterize the sand-lens-network does not exist, and full excavation or extensive drilling is therefore the only solution. Acquisition and modeling of crosshole ground penetrating radar (GPR)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In geophysics, the most common methods to identify the presence of clay minerals non‐intrusively in the field are electrical and electromagnetic methods (e.g., Auken et al., 2017): direct current electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) (e.g., Batayneh, 2006), induced polarization (IP) (e.g., Lévy, Maurya, et al., 2019; Okay et al., 2013), time‐domain electromagnetics (TDEM) (e.g., Finco et al., 2018), frequency domain (FDEM) electromagnetics (e.g., Spichak & Manzella, 2009), and ground penetrating radar (GPR) (e.g., Looms et al., 2018). However, if clays are usually associated to high electrical conductivity zones, they can be mistaken with highly mineralized pore water when only the real electrical conductivity is considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In geophysics, the most common methods to identify the presence of clay minerals non‐intrusively in the field are electrical and electromagnetic methods (e.g., Auken et al., 2017): direct current electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) (e.g., Batayneh, 2006), induced polarization (IP) (e.g., Lévy, Maurya, et al., 2019; Okay et al., 2013), time‐domain electromagnetics (TDEM) (e.g., Finco et al., 2018), frequency domain (FDEM) electromagnetics (e.g., Spichak & Manzella, 2009), and ground penetrating radar (GPR) (e.g., Looms et al., 2018). However, if clays are usually associated to high electrical conductivity zones, they can be mistaken with highly mineralized pore water when only the real electrical conductivity is considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in conductive environments, the greater attenuation of the EM signal severely limits the imaging distance between boreholes. Looms et al (2018), succeeded in mapping sand-lenses in a clayey till by full waveform inversion of cross-borehole GPR data, collected at the same gravel pit as will be presented here. The main advantage of the resistivity method in comparison to the GPR method, is that the resistivity method also works in fully saturated zones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pollutants and ENP infiltrate beyond shallow soils and enter the saturated zone via coarser sediment grains, matrix heterogeneities, well-connected macro or micropores and preferential flow paths, which i.e. develop along fractures and cracks (Kessler et al, 2012;Looms Zibar et al, 2018;Mosthaf et al, 2021). Thus, although we lack evidence of nanoplastic occurrence in deeper aquifers, it may be due to analytical limitations (Schwaferts et al, 2019) that their occurrence in shallow and deeper aquifer systems and subsurface reservoirs is overseen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%