2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.08.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping soil carbon stocks across Scotland using a neural network model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, ANN provides excellent modeling capabilities for complex, noisy environmental datasets where the relationship between input and output parameters is not well understood. Finally, NNs are frequently considered "black box" models because extracting the information they develop is easier on the modeled system than with other approaches [71]. Thus, the approach is convenient to use.…”
Section: Artificial Neural Network (Ann) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, ANN provides excellent modeling capabilities for complex, noisy environmental datasets where the relationship between input and output parameters is not well understood. Finally, NNs are frequently considered "black box" models because extracting the information they develop is easier on the modeled system than with other approaches [71]. Thus, the approach is convenient to use.…”
Section: Artificial Neural Network (Ann) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, fjord sediments hold a greater quantity of C than all the living vegetation in Scotland (Forestry Commission, 2015;Henrys et al, 2016;Vanguelova et al, 2013). While Scotland's soils (Aitkenhead and Coull, 2016), particularly the peatlands (Chapman et al, 2009), contain a greater quantity of OC than the fjords, it must be remembered that the fjord sediments also hold IC and the areal extent of these stores differs greatly. When normalised by area (Fig.…”
Section: Comparison To Other Mid-latitude Carbon Stocks: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main sources of uncertainty are peat depth and bulk density, for which there are not enough values measured from field survey to provide a robust statistical overview of Scotland's peats, and the extent of peatland, which varies according to the definition used to map it. The most recent estimates are closer to each other: 813 Mt C for the first meter of depth according to Aitkenhead and Coull (2016) and 1620 Mt C for the first two meters of depth according to Chapman et al (2009).…”
Section: Carbon Stockmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In this work, we used carbon stock data obtained with a Neural Network approach (NN), which considers soil, topographic and climatic parameters, and combines them with loss on ignition, bulk density and peat depth data. These data (Aitkenhead, in prep) are the update of Aitkenhead and Coull (2016), and they consider the whole peat depth (instead of just the first meter). The resolution of this dataset is 100 × 100 m.…”
Section: Carbon Stockmentioning
confidence: 99%