2008
DOI: 10.1002/sce.20292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping student understanding in chemistry: The Perspectives of Chemists

Abstract: ABSTRACT:Preliminary pilot studies and a field study show how a generalizable conceptual framework calibrated with item response modeling can be used to describe the development of student conceptual understanding in chemistry. ChemQuery is an assessment system that uses a framework of the key ideas in the discipline, called the Perspectives of Chemists, and criterion-referenced analysis using item response models (item response theory (IRT)) to map student progress. It includes assessment questions, a scoring… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A construct-modeling approach to measurement development is a particularly powerful one for researchers interested in understanding knowledge progression, as opposed to ranking students according to performance. Although Mark Wilson has written an authoritative text on the topic (Wilson, 2005), there are only a handful of examples of using a construct-modeling approach in the empirical research literature (see Acton, Kunz, Wilson, & Hall, 2005; Masse, Heesch, Eason, & Wilson, 2006; Wilson, 2008), with only a few focused on academic knowledge (see Claesgens, Scalise, Wilson, & Stacy, 2009; Dawson-Tunik, Commons, Wilson, & Fischer, 2005; Wilson & Sloane, 2000). We found construct modeling to be very insightful and hope this article will inspire other educational and developmental psychologists to use the approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A construct-modeling approach to measurement development is a particularly powerful one for researchers interested in understanding knowledge progression, as opposed to ranking students according to performance. Although Mark Wilson has written an authoritative text on the topic (Wilson, 2005), there are only a handful of examples of using a construct-modeling approach in the empirical research literature (see Acton, Kunz, Wilson, & Hall, 2005; Masse, Heesch, Eason, & Wilson, 2006; Wilson, 2008), with only a few focused on academic knowledge (see Claesgens, Scalise, Wilson, & Stacy, 2009; Dawson-Tunik, Commons, Wilson, & Fischer, 2005; Wilson & Sloane, 2000). We found construct modeling to be very insightful and hope this article will inspire other educational and developmental psychologists to use the approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Rasch model has been introduced as a measurement method that can integrate the diagnostic evaluation approach of students' misconception with summative evaluation of students (Liu, 2012). Although there are still studies that develop formative evaluations to investigate the progression of student learning outcomes (Claesgens, Scalise, Wilson, & Stacy, 2009;Hadenfeldt et al, 2013), several other studies have developed integrative diagnostic and summative approaches (Hoe & Subramaniam, 2016). In fact, there are studies have developed instruments based on Rasch modeling, which integrate the diagnostic evaluation approach to misconception with summative evaluation in chemistry learning (Chi, Wang, Luo, Yang, & Huang, 2018).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When learning is considered in the conceptual understanding dimension, it means that scientific facts and algorithms are understood beyond memorization and a dynamic process between what is desired and achieved in the students is structured. In this sense, it is expected students to move from answers containing scientific terms and formula-based solutions to answers integrating new concepts and making connections between those concepts to achieve transitions to higher-order thinking in explaining scientific truth (Claesgens, Scalise, Wilson & Stacy, 2009). However, it is difficult to explain concepts using the content knowledge for students, especially the concepts related to electromagnetism, regardless of age group (Beer, 2010).…”
Section: The Role Of Rubrics In Students' Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%