2012
DOI: 10.5402/2012/676905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping the Diagnosis Axis of an Interface Terminology to the NANDA International Taxonomy

Abstract: Background. Nursing terminologies are designed to support nursing practice but, as with any other clinical tool, they should be evaluated. Cross-mapping is a formal method for examining the validity of the existing controlled vocabularies. Objectives. The study aims to assess the inclusiveness and expressiveness of the nursing diagnosis axis of a newly implemented interface terminology by cross-mapping with the NANDA-I taxonomy. Design/Methods. The study applied a descriptive design, using a cross-sectional, b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this AE, the evolution of care was recorded in 122 episodes of care, and the evolution of care was recordedin higher number in a preformulated template for 71 (46.4%) of the care episodes (Table 3). 16.3%), with a p value=0.03. Statistically significant differences in prescriptions of care were also observed in the records, with means for PU-related prescriptions of 2.5 vs. 1.5, with a p value=0.01, means for SSI-related prescriptions of 1.9 vs. 0.4, with a p value<0.05, and means for AP-related prescriptions of 1.4 vs. 0.7, with a p value=0.02.…”
Section: Completenessmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this AE, the evolution of care was recorded in 122 episodes of care, and the evolution of care was recordedin higher number in a preformulated template for 71 (46.4%) of the care episodes (Table 3). 16.3%), with a p value=0.03. Statistically significant differences in prescriptions of care were also observed in the records, with means for PU-related prescriptions of 2.5 vs. 1.5, with a p value=0.01, means for SSI-related prescriptions of 1.9 vs. 0.4, with a p value<0.05, and means for AP-related prescriptions of 1.4 vs. 0.7, with a p value=0.02.…”
Section: Completenessmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…ATIC (14) is "a nursing interface terminology, multiaxial and concept-oriented, based on the study of natural language that nurses use in their daily practice and revised for its theoretical refinement". ATIC has been subjected to qualitative validation and analysis of its metric properties (15)(16) . ATIC is routinely used in the electronic medical records (EMR) of multiple hospitals and public health centers in the public network of Catalonia (Spain) since 2007, generating more than 200,000 records of annual care episodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information on the evolving status of the terminology, its philosophical and theoretical foundations based on an interpretative conceptualization of the meta paradigmatic concepts of the discipline (individual, health, environment and nursing), an analysis of its conceptual framework, including the nursing process, diagnosis, outcomes and interventions, and some other studies have been published elsewhere [25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Brief Description Of the Evaluated Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increasing use of electronic medical record software in different healthcare settings highlights the need of employing a standardized language in nursing records in order to facilitate the efficient registration and access of data (Jones, Lunney, Keenan, & Moorhead, 2010;von Krogh & Naden, 2008). Therefore, over the last decades, there has been a significant breakthrough at an international level in the development of different taxonomies and classification systems that translate the specific nursing functions in the care of patients to a standardized terminology (Juvé Udina, Gonzalez Samartino, & Matud Calvo, 2012;von Krogh & Naden, 2008;Saranto et al, 2013). Currently, the American Nurses Association recognizes up to 13 different terminologies and data sets that represent the different aspects of the nursing clinical practice (American Nurses Association [ANA], 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%