2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.03.10.21252820
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping the human genetic architecture of COVID-19 by worldwide meta-analysis

Abstract: The genetic makeup of an individual contributes to susceptibility and response to viral infection. While environmental, clinical and social factors play a role in exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 disease severity, host genetics may also be important. Identifying host-specific genetic factors indicate biological mechanisms of therapeutic relevance and clarify causal relationships of modifiable environmental risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection and outcomes. We formed a global network of researchers to inves… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
54
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
3
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most significant replication was observed at the FOXP4 locus, where the risk allele was known to be more prevalent in East Asians than in Europeans, and expected to have a higher power to be detected in East Asians 16…”
Section: Cross-population Comparisons Of the Covid-19-associated Variantsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most significant replication was observed at the FOXP4 locus, where the risk allele was known to be more prevalent in East Asians than in Europeans, and expected to have a higher power to be detected in East Asians 16…”
Section: Cross-population Comparisons Of the Covid-19-associated Variantsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We then looked up the MR results in Europeans by using publicly released GWAS summary statistics of COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative (release 5) 16 . We observed significant causal inferences of obesity consistent with those in Japanese.…”
Section: Causal Inference On Covid-19 By Cross-population Mendelian Randomizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each phenotype, four distinct GWASs were performed by either including only individuals from European descent (referred to as European-only hereafter) or individuals from multiple ethnicities (referred to as multi-ethnic hereafter), and using two sets of control individuals either from both the 23andMe and UK Biobank resources or only from 23andMe. Overall, these 16 GWASs identified 15 genomic loci that are significantly associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or COVID-19 severity 12 , confirming that this disease has a strong underlying genetic component. For several of these loci likely causal variants and their associated target genes have been described and replicated in multiple studies, suggesting that genetic variation contributing to COVID-19 disease is present multiple populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Most of these risk factors have a well-known genetic component [9][10][11] , suggesting that risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or disease severity may also be influenced by the genetic background of an individual. The COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative (COVID-19 HGI, https://www.covid19hg.org/) is currently leading a public effort worldwide to analyze COVID-19 information for millions of individuals in conjunction with genotype data in order to identify genetic variants associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection as well as COVID-19 hospitalization and disease severity 12,13 . To date the COVID-19 HGI has conducted a meta-analysis on four phenotypes (very severe respiratory confirmed COVID-19 vs. population, A2; hospitalized vs. non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients, B1; hospitalized vs. population, B2; and COVID-19 patients vs. population, C2) by combining 46 studies worldwide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our one-sample Mendelian randomisation analysis in UKB had limited power to reliably estimate causal effects as fewer than one thousand participants had been hospitalised after a positive SARS-CoV-2 test and our genetic instrument of 131 variants, while using the most up to date information on LTL-associated variants, accounts for only ~4% of inter-individual variation in LTL. 11 While there are data from large genetic studies of COVID-19 24 , they could not be used in our analysis because the outcome definitions differed substantially from those we used, and because of their inclusion of within hospital testing that is potentially a collider with LTL and COVID-19 outcomes. Larger sample sizes with comparable disease phenotypes should, therefore, enable more precise evaluation of a potential causal association between shorter LTL and adverse COVID-19 outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%