Mapping the implications and competencies for Industry 4.0 to hard and soft total quality management

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to map the implications and competencies for Industry 4.0 to the hard and soft aspects of total quality management (TQM).Design/methodology/approachThe author/s collected data from purposively drawn samples of early-career engineering professionals (ECEPs) using a cross-sectional survey. A total of 20 ECEPs from three small-class cohorts (2014, 2016 and 2018) participated in the survey. The author/s analyzed data using the Kruskal–Wallis test and Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test to establish the effect of cohort and gender on the implications and competencies for Industry 4.0. The author/s then mapped the top- and bottom-ranked implications and competencies onto the hard and soft aspects of TQM using a matrix.FindingsBased on the cohort, significant differences p < 0.05 existed in the interests and competencies for Industry 4.0. In congruence, the 2014 cohort had the highest number of “unique” top- and bottom-ranked competencies and implications spanning the hard and soft TQM. Based on gender, nonsignificant differences p < 0.05 existed in the interests and competencies for Industry 4.0. The male and female ECEPs' “common” top-ranked implications appeared under the hard and soft TQM. All their “common” top-ranked competencies appeared under the hard TQM, while all their “common” bottom-ranked competencies appeared under the soft TQM.Research limitations/implicationsThe sample size, context/discipline and perceptual data are limitations.Practical implicationsOptimizing an existing TQM framework/matrix to design Industry 4.0 TQM, advanced as TQM 4.0.Originality/valuePerspectives of early-career professionals for TQM 4.0 implementation.

Analysing the impact of sustainable human resource management practices and industry 4.0 technologies adoption on employability skills

“…The organisations are redesigning their existing processes to upgrade their soft and hard skills (Babatunde, 2021). The managers are identifying innovative models to adopt the I4Te for improvisation in their processes.…”

Total quality management 4.0: adapting quality management to Industry 4.0

“…In this sense, just as Babatunde (2020) and Chiarini (2020) conducted their research, future research can further explore what are the main competencies to be developed and how to develop them, taking into account the different cultures and existing business models, contributing to the increased integration in the People and QC sphere of the TQM 4.0 ecosystem. Therefore, since TQM 4.0 is a recent concept in the literature, several issues must be explored regarding its scope and definition.…”

Quality 4.0: literature review analysis, definition and impacts of the digital transformation process on quality

“…Soft aspects, as mentioned above, comprise management concepts and principles related to social and behavioral dimensions. Technical aspects encompass technical strategies as well as management tools, practices and systems to deal with the design, implementation and improvement of products, services and processes (Kanapathy et al , 2017; Babatunde, 2020; Sciarelli et al , 2020). Foidl and Felderer (2016) highlighted a few challenges for Quality Management in Industry 4.0, including integration, the use of Quality metrics for decision-making or the design of processes from sourcing to delivery.…”