Mapping the knowledge base and theoretical evolution of workplace conflict outcomes: a bibliometric and qualitative review, 1972–2022

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to understand workplace conflict outcomes (WCO) literature and identify the research gaps by mapping its knowledge base and theoretical evolution. Design/methodology/approach This study combines bibliometric and qualitative analysis and encompasses 1,043 Scopus-indexed documents published between 1972 and 2022. The bibliometric analysis used VOSviewer, Excel and Tableau software for descriptive statistics, citation and co-citation analyses of publication patterns, authors, documents and journals. The qualitative analysis critiqued main theoretical perspectives and topical interests. Findings This study revealed a significant increase in literature after 2000, with authors representing 70 societies, primarily the USA, China, Australia, Canada and the Netherlands. Influential authors and their canonical articles were identified, including Jehn, De Dreu, Spector, Amason and Pelled. Highly cited articles focused on task, relationship, role and process conflict. Four main theoretical schools were categorized: conflict type paradigm, individual differences, conflict cooccurrence and conflict dynamics. Influential journals spanned psychology, management, negotiation and decision-making and business and marketing fields, including JAP, AMJ, ASQ, JM, JOB, AMR, IJCMA and OS. Research limitations/implications This study provides implications for future bibliometric analyses, theoretical and empirical studies, practitioners and society based on its quantitative and qualitative findings. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study represents the first bibliometric review of WCO literature, serving as a baseline for tracking the field’s evolution and theoretical advancements.

Digital wind of changes: navigating competitiveness in the maritime sector through the transformation in human resource development

“…The present study utilises a bibliometric analysis methodology to comprehensively evaluate and amalgamate the extant literature pertaining to the influence of digitalisation in HRD on the competitive advantage of organisations operating within the maritime industry. Bibliometrics is a research methodology that employs quantitative analysis to examine publications, citations, co-citations and co-word analysis in order to delineate the intellectual framework of a specific field of study (Dede and Ozdemir, 2022;Su and Rungruang, 2024). Within the scope of this research, the utilisation of co-word analysis enables the identification of prominent research themes, trends, and patterns within the existing body of literature.…”