Mapping the literature of internal auditing in Europe: a systematic review and agenda for future research

Abstract

Purpose Although many firms are investing considerable resources in building and designing strong and effective internal auditing (IA) to improve corporate governance and internal control processes, IA literature is still relatively fragmented. Therefore, this paper aims to provide a systematic review of studies on IA in 27 European countries and the UK. Design/methodology/approach Based on the Scopus database, 142 papers published between 1987 and 2022 were analyzed. This study focused on evaluating and analyzing the characteristics of literature and the themes investigated with a focus on four key aspects: governance, the effectiveness of IA, the relationship between internal auditors and other parties and risk management to provide directions for future research. Findings This study found that IA literature did not provide the integrated knowledge of internal audit functions (IAFs) and the factors that could contribute to their implementation as required. The results showed that the UK, Greece and Italy dominate the published literature in terms of the number of studies. There are a few studies that investigate IA in private institutions and nonprofit organizations. Interestingly, a vast majority of studies are not based on theoretical grounds. The results also showed that there is an absence of studies that discuss the impact of cultural and political systems as well as the demographic characteristics of auditors on the implementation of IAFs. Originality/value This study is useful for researchers, organizations and regulators because it contributes to the literature by highlighting the intellectual development of IA in the European countries and the UK, providing several directions for future studies. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this research is the first study to use a systematic review approach in evaluating the intellectual development of IA research in European countries, identifying areas and elements that received less attention in previous studies and providing a roadmap for future studies.

Mere facade? Is greenwashing behaviour lower in low‐carbon corporates?

“…The explanation for audit regulation is similar: It reduces the management's propensity for irregular operations (Akeem, 2016) or improves the disclosure quality of the company's annual reports (Abraham & Shrives, 2014). As emphasised by Hazaea et al (2022), the significance of audit oversight extends to enhancing sustainability and safeguarding stakeholders' rights to meet their demands. Similar to internal auditing, external audit oversight supports the corporate audit system, expands the knowledge base of relevant audits and advances the sustainability of auditing practices.…”

“…In contrast to various factors, such as inadequate internal audit contributing to IC deficiencies, the emphasis here is placed on external audit. As highlighted by Hazaea et al (2022), as third‐party reviewing mechanisms, external audit and internal audit complement each other, enhancing audit quality and the authenticity of corporate information. RR assesses whether a company is identified as a heavily polluting enterprise (Huang et al, 2022).…”

“…As highlighted by Hazaea and Zhu (2022), internal auditors play a crucial role in modern control systems, reducing financial manipulation and addressing the potential spread of corruption. Internal auditors, characterised by independence and objectivity, can identify risks in corporate strategies and provide corrective recommendations (Hazaea et al, 2022). Given this study incorporates ICs, encompasses the actions and outcomes of internal auditors and aligns with Hazaea et al's (2021) perspective on the complementary nature of external and internal audits, the primary focus is on external audits.…”

The Corruption Trends Within the Asean Countries: A Bibliometric Analysis Review

“…Therefore, it is interesting to analyze the issue of corruption from a literature review perspective by analyzing previous studies. By going over the previously published literature, we may keep an eye on the investigations' limitations, try to address issues that were missed but were found by reading the literature, and choose the course of future research (Hazaea et al, 2022).…”

Objectivity Threats: Would it Jeopardise Malaysian Internal Auditors’ Risk Judgment Quality?

“…Such research should delve into how this role can be best defined, evaluated, and adapted in response to contemporary business developments. Concurrently, Hazaea et al (2022) have passionately emphasized the urgent need for an investigation into the integral role played by internal auditors in the realm of risk management, given their pivotal function in ensuring the long-term sustainability and stability of organizations. The weight of responsibility carried by internal auditors in this context is undeniably substantial.…”