2021
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stab3448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping the magnetic field in the Taurus/B211 filamentary cloud with SOFIA HAWC + and comparing with simulation

Abstract: Optical and infrared polarization mapping and recent Planck observations of the filametary cloud L1495 in Taurus show that the large-scale magnetic field is approximately perpendicular to the long axis of the cloud. We use the HAWC+ polarimeter on SOFIA to probe the complex magnetic field in the B211 part of the cloud. Our results reveal a dispersion of polarization angles of 36○, about five times that measured on a larger scale by Planck. Applying the Davis-Chandrasekhar-Fermi (DCF) method with velocity infor… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We hope that our treatment satisfies other authors' concerns about the Skalidis & Tassis (2020) coupling term method. These concerns have taken two forms; one is that the energy contribution from δB • B0 V must = 0 because δB V = 0, as highlighted in the appendix of Li et al (2021b). But as has been extensively discussed in S+2021, and in Section 3 of the current study, δB • B0 V = 0 is not a valid way of understanding the contribution from the coupling term.…”
Section: Discussion Of Section 4 and Caveatsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We hope that our treatment satisfies other authors' concerns about the Skalidis & Tassis (2020) coupling term method. These concerns have taken two forms; one is that the energy contribution from δB • B0 V must = 0 because δB V = 0, as highlighted in the appendix of Li et al (2021b). But as has been extensively discussed in S+2021, and in Section 3 of the current study, δB • B0 V = 0 is not a valid way of understanding the contribution from the coupling term.…”
Section: Discussion Of Section 4 and Caveatsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…But as has been extensively discussed in S+2021, and in Section 3 of the current study, δB • B0 V = 0 is not a valid way of understanding the contribution from the coupling term. The other concern raised in the appendix of Li et al (2021a), is that energy balance only involves 2 nd order quantities; this approach by definition omits the coupling term contribution, which is first order, in the energetics. Omission of the coupling term leads to significantly underestimating the magnetic energy in sub-Alfvénic turbulence 9 ; this is strongly supported by our numerical results in Figure 5 and 6.…”
Section: Discussion Of Section 4 and Caveatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, observations of molecular clouds or the Galactic center may have extended emission much larger than the polarimetry FOV in any given band. We point the reader to Taurus/L1495 observed with HAWC+ at 214 µm, where further pipeline steps were required to recover those large-scales (Li et al 2021). For all the galaxies in our sample, observations with a sky rotation smaller than 3 • were reduced within the same set, which increases the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) per pixel to optimize the correlation between the astrophysical, sky, and instrumental signals.…”
Section: Processing Raw Data Using Crushmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar approach was used in Taurus/L1495 by Li et al (2021), where a simpler approach to estimating the background in a C2N observation was performed. For these observations, an adjacent region equal to the FOV of the HAWC+ array close to the molecular cloud was identified using Herschel images.…”
Section: Zero-level Background Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation