Mapping the Mobile DNA of News. Understanding Incidental and Serendipitous Mobile News Consumption

Abstract

Scholarly work argues that mobile technology facilitates serendipitous news consumption. This article examines how users understand serendipity in mobile news consumption and whether this leads to news diversity. Technology-mediated news encounters are argued to reduce news diversity, yet these theoretical filter bubbles cannot be found empirically. This paper investigates whether this might be explained by incidental news use. A mixed methods study (n=20) was set up, which involved interviews, on-device loggings and experience sampling data. Results show that incidental news differs in the level of user agency, ranging from responding to an unsolicited recommendation or alert; via monitoring, facilitated by a previous action (e.g. activated news notifications); to browsing or stumbling upon unexpected topics during news use. Incidental encounters become serendipitous when they provide new information or insights and consequently stick in one's mind. Based on our findings, we further develop a conceptual model for (mobile) incidental news, which shows the interplay of news recommendations by peers, algorithms, and editors. Editorial recommendations result in topic diversity. Both peer and algorithmic recommendations lead to brand diversity, yet this remains unnoticed to audiences. Peer recommendations mostly do not lead to topic or viewpoint diversity, but are perceived as valuable when they do.

Staying Informed and Bridging “Social Distance”: Smartphone News Use and Mobile Messaging Behaviors of Flemish Adults during the First Weeks of the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…Smartphones offer instant and ubiquitous access to information and help people coordinate their everyday work, family, and social life ( Castells et al 2009 ; Vanden Abeele, De Wolf, and Ling 2018 ). They also allow users to consult the latest news ( Van Damme et al 2020 ) and to express and share their thoughts, concerns, and opinions on social media platforms, thereby offering opportunities for “digital citizenship” and “connective actions” ( Bennett and Segerberg 2012 ; Ohme 2019a ). In times of crisis, people may rely on these affordances of smartphones more than in regular times.…”

Anything Goes? Youth, News, and Democratic Engagement in the Roaring 2020s

“…It also seems outdated to ask whether or not young people follow the news. The increase in access points via mobile devices (Van Damme et al 2020), inadvertent exposure to news on social media platforms (Kahne and Bowyer 2018), chat groups (Vermeer et al 2020), or on-demand formats like podcasts or YouTube (Saunders and colleagues) seem to have led to a situation where most young people do get news – whether they seek it or not. As Thorson (2020) puts it, we may be entering a time when young people's individual profiles determine how much and what kind of news they attract, but where total news avoidance increasingly becomes unlikely (Edgerly et al 2018; Toff and Nielsen 2018).…”

Taking a Break from News: A Five-nation Study of News Avoidance in the Digital Era

“…Yet, even incidental exposure to news is still guided by the motivations and actions of individuals, as well as the sociocultural context in which they operate (Mitchelstein et al 2020). Seeking news offers better possibilities for all kinds of serendipitous and diverse encounters with news (Van Damme et al 2020). Those individuals who are more interested in the news are also more often found by the news or "attracted" by them (Thorson 2020).…”