2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-005-5475-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping the probability of large fire occurrence in northern Arizona, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
76
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
76
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, from the Canadian boreal forest to the mixed chaparral and conifer forest of southern California, fire ignitions are often spatially clustered and the probability of human-caused wildfires decreases with an increase in the distance from human infrastructures, where more fires occur at the wildland-urban interfaces than in the backcountry (Chou et al 1993;Vega-García et al 1993;Cardille et al 2001;Zhai et al 2003;Syphard et al 2007aSyphard et al , b, 2008Pew and Larsen 2001;Pyne 2001;Keeley et al 2004;Yang et al 2007;Bar Massada et al 2009;Calef et al 2009). However, in places where humans do not cause most fires, the probability of occurrence was greater in areas where road density was lower (Dickson et al 2006). The same trend occurs in Russia, where the increasing exploitation of natural resources entails a high number of people per se, and an expanded road network that enables access to remote areas (Zakharov 1977;Noga and Tikhonov 1979;Sofronov and Vakurov 1981;Odintsov 1995;Sergienko 1996Sergienko , 1999Furyaev 1996;Karpachevskiy 2004;Achard et al 2008); fire occurrence…”
Section: Comparison With Countries Outside Europementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, from the Canadian boreal forest to the mixed chaparral and conifer forest of southern California, fire ignitions are often spatially clustered and the probability of human-caused wildfires decreases with an increase in the distance from human infrastructures, where more fires occur at the wildland-urban interfaces than in the backcountry (Chou et al 1993;Vega-García et al 1993;Cardille et al 2001;Zhai et al 2003;Syphard et al 2007aSyphard et al , b, 2008Pew and Larsen 2001;Pyne 2001;Keeley et al 2004;Yang et al 2007;Bar Massada et al 2009;Calef et al 2009). However, in places where humans do not cause most fires, the probability of occurrence was greater in areas where road density was lower (Dickson et al 2006). The same trend occurs in Russia, where the increasing exploitation of natural resources entails a high number of people per se, and an expanded road network that enables access to remote areas (Zakharov 1977;Noga and Tikhonov 1979;Sofronov and Vakurov 1981;Odintsov 1995;Sergienko 1996Sergienko , 1999Furyaev 1996;Karpachevskiy 2004;Achard et al 2008); fire occurrence…”
Section: Comparison With Countries Outside Europementioning
confidence: 97%
“…(Dickson et al 2006). In the temperate rainforest on Vancouver Island (Canada), recreation and miscellaneous related fires tend to be significantly smaller than logging fires (Pew and Larsen 2001) and drivers of agricultural fires (mostly human-caused) differ from those of forest fires (Miranda et al 2012).…”
Section: Comparison With Countries Outside Europementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same conclusions about how topography reflects the locations of human activities in relation to fire ignitions are indicated for a region of China by Xu et al (2006), showing that the anthropogenic factors are closely related to fires when altitudes of forests are lower than 900 m. However, at higher elevations their influence is much lower. In other studies the topography effect has been related with fires, using variables related with roughness or terrain shape index (Dickson et al, 2006, Nunes, 2012Padilla and Vega-Garcia, 2011;Narayanaraj and Wimberly, 2012).…”
Section: Driving Factors Of Long-term Fire Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, weighting the inputs is major problem in such kinds of techniques because of subjective ranking (Jaiswal et al 2002). Weight of evidence analyses can be used for weighting the input variables according to fire occurrence and location to solve this problem (Dickson et al 2006). This analysis needs categorical inputs to determine the weights for each category.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%