2017
DOI: 10.1186/s13071-017-2086-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping the spatial distribution of the Japanese encephalitis vector, Culex tritaeniorhynchus Giles, 1901 (Diptera: Culicidae) within areas of Japanese encephalitis risk

Abstract: BackgroundJapanese encephalitis (JE) is one of the most significant aetiological agents of viral encephalitis in Asia. This medically important arbovirus is primarily spread from vertebrate hosts to humans by the mosquito vector Culex tritaeniorhynchus. Knowledge of the contemporary distribution of this vector species is lacking, and efforts to define areas of disease risk greatly depend on a thorough understanding of the variation in this mosquito’s geographical distribution.ResultsWe assembled a contemporary… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
(98 reference statements)
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous work mapped the distribution of Cx. tritaeniorhynchus within JE risk areas [ 78 ]. However, Tibet, Xinjiang and Qinghai province were not taken into consideration in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous work mapped the distribution of Cx. tritaeniorhynchus within JE risk areas [ 78 ]. However, Tibet, Xinjiang and Qinghai province were not taken into consideration in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biosurveillance data for Nipah outbreaks and seropositive Pteropus bats ( n = 51) (1998–2014) were acquired from the Institute of Epidemiology, Disease Control and Research (IEDCR) (Dhaka, Bangladesh) [ 57 ], the World Health Organization [ 16 ], and a variety of diverse literature sources [ 8 , 13 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 ]. Vector-borne and zoonotic agents are spatially dependent on the geographic distribution of both their vectors and hosts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the use of AUC to evaluate discrimination performance of SDMs has been questioned [ 29 , 48 ], this metric is used in several recent papers, dealing with biodiversity conservation (e.g. [ 26 28 ]) or other research fields [ 49 , 50 ], even when the authors themselves state that the absence data they use may not reflect real absences [ 28 ]. We used AUC as discrimination metric for the BRT models obtained because, even though it should not be used to compare models for different species in presence-background models [ 29 ], it can still be used to compare different modelling approaches applied to the same species at the same extent [ 48 ], which is one of the main purposes of this paper.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%