2022
DOI: 10.1504/ijogct.2022.121050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping urban form and land use with deep learning techniques: a case study of Dongguan City, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These methods cannot resolve the heterogeneity within land uses and are hard to produce accurate results for complex land uses, because they rely heavily on the qualities of hand-crafted features which can be highly heterogeneous and are easily mis-classified by the traditional classifiers. To resolve this issue, state-of-the-art deep learning methods have been widely applied to land-use classifications in recent several years [32], as deep learning methods can automatically extract robust, representative, and abstract features of land uses, reducing the heterogeneity and improving the classification accuracy [33], [34], [35]. However, deep-learning semantic segmentation methods, such as RefineNet, PSPNet, and DeepLabv3+ [36], [37], may exacerbate the ambiguity of land-use boundaries due to the deconvolution and upsampling processes [38], leading to inaccurate boundaries of land uses.…”
Section: A Land-use Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods cannot resolve the heterogeneity within land uses and are hard to produce accurate results for complex land uses, because they rely heavily on the qualities of hand-crafted features which can be highly heterogeneous and are easily mis-classified by the traditional classifiers. To resolve this issue, state-of-the-art deep learning methods have been widely applied to land-use classifications in recent several years [32], as deep learning methods can automatically extract robust, representative, and abstract features of land uses, reducing the heterogeneity and improving the classification accuracy [33], [34], [35]. However, deep-learning semantic segmentation methods, such as RefineNet, PSPNet, and DeepLabv3+ [36], [37], may exacerbate the ambiguity of land-use boundaries due to the deconvolution and upsampling processes [38], leading to inaccurate boundaries of land uses.…”
Section: A Land-use Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%