2015
DOI: 10.1145/2811257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mapping User Preference to Privacy Default Settings

Abstract: Managing the privacy of online information can be a complex task often involving the configuration of a variety of settings. For example, Facebook users determine which audiences have access to their profile information and posts, how friends can interact with them through tagging, and how others can search for them—and many more privacy tasks. In most cases, the default privacy settings are permissive and appear to be designed to promote information sharing rather than privacy. Managing privacy online can be … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, users could define a default response to the solutions suggested, e.g., always accept the suggested solution without asking me 9 , which, as shown in the evaluation (Section 6), would actually match user behaviour very accurately. Other suitable defaults could be applied based on approaches like [39], [40], [41], or users' responses could be (semi-)automated based on the concession rules instantiated in each situation, using any of the machine-learning approaches shown to work very well in social media privacy settings [18], [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, users could define a default response to the solutions suggested, e.g., always accept the suggested solution without asking me 9 , which, as shown in the evaluation (Section 6), would actually match user behaviour very accurately. Other suitable defaults could be applied based on approaches like [39], [40], [41], or users' responses could be (semi-)automated based on the concession rules instantiated in each situation, using any of the machine-learning approaches shown to work very well in social media privacy settings [18], [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automatically inferring privacy needs from usage data Social network sites offer a variety of tools that allow an individual to set disclosure rules. Previous research has explored various methods for improving the understanding of complex privacy settings in SNSs (Watson et al, 2015). A recent study describes a privacy wizard for SNSs that describes a particular user's privacy preferences based on a limited amount of user input (Fang and LeFevre, 2010).…”
Section: Social Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in the area of smartphone app permissions, Liu et al [49] show that three profiles may be sufficient to capture users' permission preferences (they later developed an approach with 7 profiles [50]). Finally, in an SNS context, Fang and LeFevre [51] demonstrate how a "privacy wizard" can simplify privacy settings in a way that is simple to understand and use, while Watson et al [52] find that using multiple default settings does not significantly improve their fit beyond a single, optimized default setting.…”
Section: User-tailored Privacymentioning
confidence: 99%