Mapping wastes in complex projects for Lean Product Development

Abstract

Lean Product Development (LPD) is suggested as an approach that can reduce waste in projects aimed at developing technically complex items, which typically present substantial uncertainty about their output, as well as higher costs and longer development times. However, how can LPD be implemented in complex projects, where some redundancies in the development process are considered necessary in order to guarantee the quality of the final outcome? This paper answers this question, through a survey conducted at INAF, the Italian Institute of Astrophysics, that runs complex projects. The evidence shows that complex projects can actually be affected by the types of waste reported in LPD literature. Still, researchers may fail to determine the real priorities of intervention as they have trouble distinguishing between value-adding and value-destroying activities. Furthermore, they do not perceive the relevance of addressing the wastes generated by their own work; on the contrary, they place considerable attention on inefficiencies that are beyond the scope of their direct responsibilities. Recommendations to overcome this problem are proposed.

The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility Practices and Environmental Factors through a Moderating Role of Social Media Marketing on Sustainable Performance of Business Firms

“…Typically, risk and product launching costs should be closely associated with decision-making processes. In a lean launch, the fundamental principle based on an efficient business strategy of delaying the product, which suggests waiting until the product's latest probable point of marketing processing to reschedule changes in a product's inventory [76][77][78][79]. Usually, manufacturers might leverage new product development activities to increase product profitability and market share.…”

Integrator’s Coordination on Technological Innovation Performance in China: The Dual Moderating Role of Environmental Dynamism

“…Among the numerous studies focusing on the antecedents of CoPS innovation, the compatibility of the technologies and functions across modules [16], with the underlying coordination effort made by the integrator to work jointly with its various key suppliers, is the far more fundamental and critical factor that contributes to the success of CoPS innovation, especially in the CoPS context of highly interdependent tasks and closely coupled technologies [18]. In this vein, the lean [19][20][21] and agile [22,23] manufacturing practices share the same core dimension as coordination with CoPS innovation in improving the efficiency of productive and innovative activities.…”

“…While the integrator's coordination might be important to other industries too, their role in CoPS sectors is critical and irreplaceable [7]. In addition, while existing studies on new production innovation [12], innovation network [8,14], organization structure [4], lean [19][20][21] and agile [22,23] manufacturing and alliance management [16,30,59] have mainly emphasized the benefits of coordination in inter-organizational collaboration, under more complex context, higher level of coordinated activities are required to process the whole project smoothly [12]. It is exactly the case in the extreme complex context of CoPS innovation where the integrator shoulders the main responsibility for the coordinated activities.…”

Application of Lean Methods into the Customised Product Development Process of Large Power Transformers

“…Stjepandić et al contributed to concurrent engineering (CE) with their comprehensive book comprising extensive theoretical background with contemporary case studies [19]. LPD can improve the performance of complex projects by identification of major wastes according to Belvedere et al [20].…”