1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf00613976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maps of the acute zones of fly eyes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
130
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
6
130
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the region of binocular overlap in the frontal visual ®eld is not appreciated in its complete extent (cf. Beersma et al 1977;Land and Eckert 1985). Nevertheless, optical axes of ommatidia residing in the frontal to dorsofrontal part of the eye are clearly directed towards the contralateral left visual ®eld.…”
Section: The Map Of Optical Axesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the region of binocular overlap in the frontal visual ®eld is not appreciated in its complete extent (cf. Beersma et al 1977;Land and Eckert 1985). Nevertheless, optical axes of ommatidia residing in the frontal to dorsofrontal part of the eye are clearly directed towards the contralateral left visual ®eld.…”
Section: The Map Of Optical Axesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The orientations of the ommatidial rows of the eye lattice of di erent¯y species were found to change over the eye in a characteristic way (Beersma et al 1975;data of Franceschini in Hausen 1981;Land and Eckert 1985). The organization of the eye's lattice has been related to the local preferred directions of motion sensitive wide®eld neurons (McCann and Forster 1971) for the ®rst time by Beersma et al (1975) in the house¯y Musca.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To achieve a large FOV the camera system was equipped with a fisheye lens covering a solid angle of approximately 2π sr, i.e., half of the unit sphere. The highest spatial resolution found in Calliphora amounts to inter-ommatidial angles of ϕ = 1.07 • (Land and Eckert 1985) and is reached in the frontal visual field (Petrowitz et al 2000). Thus, to obtain a spatial resolution better than 1 • per pixel in the frontal part while using a 185 • fisheye lens the sensor system had to have a resolution of at least 185 × 185 pixels.…”
Section: Requirements and Restrictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%