2020
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2019.1071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marangoni-driven film climbing on a draining pre-wetted film

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, τ ≥ 60 s, the measured data starts to deviate from Huppert’s solution with ≈25% difference in the film thickness, whereas the data agrees well with our model until the end of the measurement (≈230s). However, when the contact line slips faster after ≈60 s, the drainage length x 0 is significantly influenced by the contact line velocity, thus the film thickness decreases faster due to the dewetting effect as reported previously . Moreover, the curvature of the liquid film transverse to the flow is sufficiently small in our experiments similar to the results reported by Xue and Stone and thus the curvature is ignored as the film thickness is presumably uniform at the center where the drops impact as noted by the parallel lines of the inset figure in Figure (b).…”
Section: Experimental Methodssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, τ ≥ 60 s, the measured data starts to deviate from Huppert’s solution with ≈25% difference in the film thickness, whereas the data agrees well with our model until the end of the measurement (≈230s). However, when the contact line slips faster after ≈60 s, the drainage length x 0 is significantly influenced by the contact line velocity, thus the film thickness decreases faster due to the dewetting effect as reported previously . Moreover, the curvature of the liquid film transverse to the flow is sufficiently small in our experiments similar to the results reported by Xue and Stone and thus the curvature is ignored as the film thickness is presumably uniform at the center where the drops impact as noted by the parallel lines of the inset figure in Figure (b).…”
Section: Experimental Methodssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The liquid film thickness was extracted based on the interferometric pattern shift over time where the film thickness difference between two neighboring fringes is λ /(2 n w ), where n w = 1.33 is the refractive index of water. The interferometric patterns formed from the glass slide were neglected due to the small variation of the thickness …”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We propose that the Marangoni flow pulls the droplet contact line with a velocity on the order of u x , so that the position x f of the advancing front moves as . As a first approximation, we consider the primary edge of the advancing fluid front as a thin fluid layer of thickness h that is subjected to Marangoni stress in the x -direction and then the fluid velocity at the liquid surface results in , where μ is the fluid viscosity 53 , 60 . One may further assume a nearly constant surface tension difference Δ γ along the flow path, 55 , 60 , and thus the motion equation is written .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a first approximation, we consider the primary edge of the advancing fluid front as a thin fluid layer of thickness h that is subjected to Marangoni stress in the x -direction and then the fluid velocity at the liquid surface results in , where μ is the fluid viscosity 53 , 60 . One may further assume a nearly constant surface tension difference Δ γ along the flow path, 55 , 60 , and thus the motion equation is written . After integration with the initial condition , t = t 0 , the front position results in , where is here defined as the Marangoni flow coefficient.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plethora of observed coating patterns motivated a great deal of studies aimed at understanding the underlying physical mechanisms (Weinstein & Ruschak 2004). Typical examples include inertia-driven Kapitza waves (Kapitza 1948; Kapitza & Kapitza 1965), Marangoni effects due to gradients in surface tension (Oron 2000; Hosoi & Bush 2001; Scheid 2013; Xue, Pack & Stone 2020) and the formation of drops (Rayleigh 1882; Taylor 1950; Fermigier et al. 1992; Chandrasekhar 2013; Jambon-Puillet et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%