Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2018
DOI: 10.24963/ijcai.2018/754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marathon Race Planning: A Case-Based Reasoning Approach

Abstract: We describe and evaluate a novel application of case-based reasoning to help marathon runners to achieve a personal best by: (a) predicting a challenging, but realistic race-time; and (b) recommending a race-plan to achieve this time.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although such data was not available in our dataset, the increasingly widespread adoption of mobile devices, smartwatches, and wearable sensors [55,56] has the capacity to generate large volumes of additional data (heart-rate, cadence, and power), which may be useful in this regard in the future [57,58]. Already, the availability of such diverse sources of data is enabling several new types of health and fitness applications [59][60][61][62][63] and the emergence of powerful new machine learning techniques has been used to support a variety of related prediction and planning tasks in several sporting domains [64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73] It is also worth noting that the model of the wall analysed here is defined by a pair of parameters-degree of slowdown and length of slowdown-with specific values-0.25 and 5km, respectively-and it is reasonable to question whether the results would be different if different values had been chosen. We have considered several alternative sets of values and, within reasonable levels of tolerance, there is no material change to the nature of the results as presented.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although such data was not available in our dataset, the increasingly widespread adoption of mobile devices, smartwatches, and wearable sensors [55,56] has the capacity to generate large volumes of additional data (heart-rate, cadence, and power), which may be useful in this regard in the future [57,58]. Already, the availability of such diverse sources of data is enabling several new types of health and fitness applications [59][60][61][62][63] and the emergence of powerful new machine learning techniques has been used to support a variety of related prediction and planning tasks in several sporting domains [64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73] It is also worth noting that the model of the wall analysed here is defined by a pair of parameters-degree of slowdown and length of slowdown-with specific values-0.25 and 5km, respectively-and it is reasonable to question whether the results would be different if different values had been chosen. We have considered several alternative sets of values and, within reasonable levels of tolerance, there is no material change to the nature of the results as presented.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is less well developed, however, is the translation of a goal-time into a specific race strategy and a concrete set of pacing recommendations. We have recently addressed this dual problem of goal-time prediction and pacing recommendation for marathons, by using case-based reasoning (Smyth and Cunningham 2017;2018b;2018a). In short, the goal-time and pacing plan for a target runner is adapted from the race-times and pacing profiles of runners with similar race histories.…”
Section: Goal-time Prediction and Pacing Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More sophisticated reasoning is enabled by considering a snapshot of the current case base in part or as a whole. Examination of this information can determine, for example, whether a case is worth adding to a case base because it increases the competence of the CBR system or whether a solution can be discarded without affecting competence (Smyth and Keane 1995). As another example see Reinartz et al contributions in (Reinartz et al,.…”
Section: Maintenance Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%