Space Operations: Contributions From the Global Community 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-51941-8_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MarCO: Interplanetary Mission Development on a CubeSat Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another line of research is the development of hardware platforms to realize and test swarm architectures. With the advent of subsystem technology for miniature spacecraft such as CubeSats [8,16,39], the feasibility of swarm architecture-based missions is rapidly increasing. Currently, platforms such as Chipsats from Cornell [40], SunCube FemtoSats from the University of Arizona [41,42] and silicon wafer integrated Femtosats from JPL [43,44] are being researched as hardware platforms for swarm-based space exploration.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another line of research is the development of hardware platforms to realize and test swarm architectures. With the advent of subsystem technology for miniature spacecraft such as CubeSats [8,16,39], the feasibility of swarm architecture-based missions is rapidly increasing. Currently, platforms such as Chipsats from Cornell [40], SunCube FemtoSats from the University of Arizona [41,42] and silicon wafer integrated Femtosats from JPL [43,44] are being researched as hardware platforms for swarm-based space exploration.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there is a strong motivation to search for better strategies to explore small bodies through flyby observations. Currently, miniature spacecraft of mass less than 50 kg are being developed as platforms to explore deep space [8,9]. The total mission cost of these spacecraft is significantly less than their large competitors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growing interest in the development of highly capable nanosatellites for a wide range of scientific missions [1][2][3][4][5] demands a substantial increase of the traditionally low success rate of this kind of miniaturized platforms, which were originally conceived for educational or technological demonstration purposes. Among the causes for their low success rate, the limited ground verification process, especially at sub-system and system levels, is a relevant one, often originating due to schedule and budget constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CubeSats are now used in a variety of missions including science and Earth observation, technological demonstrations, communication networks, and interplanetary exploration both as support for bigger spacecraft and as stand-alone platforms. They are able to operate in unprecedented architectures which would not be feasible using only bigger satellites, e.g., constellations of nanosatellites in Low Earth Orbit [2][3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%