Abstract:This article advances the interpretivist perspective on British foreign policy by studying Tony Blair's difficult encounter with the Eurosceptic tradition in Britain, popularized by Margaret Thatcher from the late 1980s. Using discourse data taken from key foreign policy speeches by the two leaders across their periods in office, the article investigates the problems Blair and his New Labour team faced when trying to justify and legitimize Britain's more constructive approach to the European Union from 1997. T… Show more
“…It is a time to recognise that only by change will Europe recover its strength, its relevance, its idealism and therefore its support amongst the people. (Blair 2005) The continuity in rhetoric and policy towards Europe between Thatcher, Major and Blair is starkly revealed in this speech and has since been well researched (Wall 2010, Daddow 2013. Differences between Blair and his predecessors were often more about tactics than objectives.…”
Section: Blair and New Labour: An End To Divisions?mentioning
Palgrave Macmillan is the global academic imprint of the above companies and has companies and representatives throughout the world.Palgrave® and Macmillan® are registered trademarks in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe and other countries. ISBN 978-1-349-55500-0 ISBN 978-1-137-00520-5 (eBook)
“…It is a time to recognise that only by change will Europe recover its strength, its relevance, its idealism and therefore its support amongst the people. (Blair 2005) The continuity in rhetoric and policy towards Europe between Thatcher, Major and Blair is starkly revealed in this speech and has since been well researched (Wall 2010, Daddow 2013. Differences between Blair and his predecessors were often more about tactics than objectives.…”
Section: Blair and New Labour: An End To Divisions?mentioning
Palgrave Macmillan is the global academic imprint of the above companies and has companies and representatives throughout the world.Palgrave® and Macmillan® are registered trademarks in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe and other countries. ISBN 978-1-349-55500-0 ISBN 978-1-137-00520-5 (eBook)
“…Britain joined the European Community in 1973 amidst a perceived risk that the demise of the empire would lead to a loss of markets and marginalization in a globalizing world. Despite this union, closer ties to Europe produced sustained anxieties concerning the European Union being a threat to British sovereignty and identity based on Britain's spatial separation as an island and equally its historical and racial distinctiveness (Daddow ; Wall ). With the Maastricht Treaty of 1991 the Community was turned into a Union (i.e., from a predominantly trading block to a more political entity with looser internal borders).…”
Section: The European Union and Externalization Of Border Controlsmentioning
This article traces the U.K.'s tepid response to the recent refugee crisis confronting Europe today and reviews Britain's approach to provide sanctuary from its ideological/historical origins to its policy enactments over time (1905‐2016). That approach resonates with the deep tensions the issue of immigration raises within the nation state and the intense uncoupling of refuge and sanctuary from its humanitarian initiatives. We juxtapose the U.K. government's engagement with the refugee crisis against its “tradition of humanitarianism” in which Britain has idealized itself as sanctuary to those who have fled from persecution, torture, or conflict. This historic ideal of refuge has been challenged with numerous immigration and asylum‐related policies as well as increased securitization of border controls in response to the changing political context since 1905. We argue that “sanctuary” is a diminished and contentious component of its present‐day humanitarianism involving increased securitization and asylum policies with stringent immigration controls. We trace the U.K.'s harsh and restrictive stance toward the refugee and the asylum seeker through a series of policies from the Aliens Act in 1905 to the Dubs Amendment of 2016 which seek to delegitimize refugees, enact tighter barriers to entry, and cast them as economic “migrants” and as suspect figures in a post‐9/11 world.
Related Articles
Related Media
AmeliaGentleman. . “‘What Crime Have I Committed to be Held Like This?’: Yarl's Wood.” The Guardian. March 3. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/mar/03/inside-yarls-wood-detention-centre-asylum-seekers-abuse-suicide
MariaPolachowska. . “Kindertransport: A Journey to Life.” BBC Newsnight. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqP0uVSj3bQ
UNHCR. . “Global Trends: Forced Displacement in 2016.” http://www.unhcr.org/uk/statistics/unhcrstats/5943e8a34/global-trends-forced-displacement-2016.html
“…The analysis presented here focuses on the debates surrounding policy discourses. Despite the evidence of intertextuality between media and elite discourses presented above (see also Daddow 2013), additional studies are needed to examine more systematically the extent to which political decision-making is shaped and confined by broader societal discourses. Following previous applications of the critical logics approach, this may be undertaken through the analysis of policy documents.…”
Section: Critical Policy Studies 15mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The article identifies a hegemonic and highly sedimented Euroskeptic discourse, which constructs a radical separation between Britain and the EU and which structures British debates about the EU. Whilst the clearest articulation of the Euroskeptic discourse can be found in the right-wing press, it dictates the terms in which the EU is discussed in other sections of the media and in elite political discourse (Hawkins 2012; see also Daddow 2013). By examining the discourse in terms of social, political and fantasmatic logics, it is possible to comprehend the structure, political dynamics and affective power of this account of Britain's relationship with the EU.…”
The decision by the UK government to hold a referendum on Britain's membership of the European Union (EU) marks an important development in policy towards the EU. Policy changes of this kind must be understood in the historical and political context in which they occur. This includes the framing of the policy issues within public discourse. In the UK, policies are formed in a discursive environment which is overwhelmingly hostile towards the EU. Debates are structured by a predominantly Euroskeptic discourse which emphasizes the UK's separation and heterogeneity from the rest of the EU. Drawing on the logics of critical explanation, this article examines the structure and affective power of Euroskeptic discourses which dictate the terms of the EU debate. It presents a case study of the recent EU treaty revision process, culminating in the Treaty of Lisbon. In so doing, it enables a deeper understanding of recent policy developments.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.