1997
DOI: 10.17016/feds.1997.22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Margin Requirements, Volatility, and Market Integrity: What Have We Learned since the Crash?

Abstract: This study assesses the state of the policy debate that surrounds the Federal regulation of margin requirements. A relatively comprehensive review of the literature nds no undisputed evidence that supports the hypothesis that margin requirements can be used to control stock return volatility and correspondingly little evidence that suggests that margin-related leverage is an important underlying source of \excess" volatility. The evidence does not support the hypothesis that there is a stable inverse relations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thought was that trade on credit resulted in over-leveraging, excessive speculation, and increased stock market volatility.? In contrast, Kupiec (1998) argues that the evidence does not indicate that leverage created by margin produces excess volatility. In terms of experimental evidence, Porter and Smith (1995) conclude that margin buying increases the amplitude of the price bubble in their experimental asset markets.…”
Section: Regularities Institutional Features and New Questionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The thought was that trade on credit resulted in over-leveraging, excessive speculation, and increased stock market volatility.? In contrast, Kupiec (1998) argues that the evidence does not indicate that leverage created by margin produces excess volatility. In terms of experimental evidence, Porter and Smith (1995) conclude that margin buying increases the amplitude of the price bubble in their experimental asset markets.…”
Section: Regularities Institutional Features and New Questionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Earlier studies examine the impact of margins separately on markets of stocks and their derivatives. Following a comprehensive survey of theoretical models and empirical evidence, Kupiec (1998) describes earlier findings as contradictory and inconclusive. 1 Some of those studies claim that margin requirements promote instability in stock trading; others conclude that margin requirements have no significant effects on the volatility of share prices or share trading volume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Those 1. See for example Kupiec [1998] and Kose et al [1997], Garbade [1982], Chowdry and Nanda [1998], Schwert [1989], Salinger [1989], Kupiec [1989], Hsieh and Miller [1990], and Seguin and Jarrell [1993].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Hardouvelis (1990), higher margin requirements reduce stock market volatility. In contrast, other studies claim that there is no clear evidence that margin regulation mitigates volatility (e.g., see Kupiec, 1997). 3 For example, see Assness, Frazzini, Gormsen, and Pedersen (2020), , Guest, Kothari, and So (2022), Hu, Pan, and Wang (2013), and Lu and Qin (2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%